Ben-Shachar Michal, Palti Dafna, Grodzinsky Yosef
Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1320-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.027.
This paper studies neural processes of sentence comprehension, focusing on a specific syntactic operation-syntactic movement. We describe two fMRI experiments that manipulate this particular syntactic component. The sentences in each of the experiments are different, yet the structural contrast in both is syntactically identical, comparing movement and no-movement sentences. Two distinct Hebrew constructions, topicalization and wh-questions, were presented in an auditory comprehension task and compared to carefully matched baseline sentences. We show that both contrasts, presented in an auditory comprehension task, yield comparable activations in a consistent set of brain regions, including left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left ventral precentral sulcus (vPCS), and bilateral posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). Furthermore, we show that these regions are not sensitive to two other syntactic contrasts. The results, considered in the context of previous imaging and lesion studies, suggest that the processing of syntactic movement involves a consistent set of brain regions, regardless of the superficial properties of the sentences at issue, and irrespective of task.
本文研究句子理解的神经过程,重点关注一种特定的句法操作——句法移位。我们描述了两个功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)实验,这些实验对这一特定的句法成分进行了操控。每个实验中的句子各不相同,但两者的结构对比在句法上是相同的,即对移位句和非移位句进行比较。在一项听觉理解任务中呈现了两种不同的希伯来语结构,即主题化和wh-疑问句,并与精心匹配的基线句子进行比较。我们发现,在听觉理解任务中呈现的这两种对比,在包括左额下回(IFG)、左腹侧中央前沟(vPCS)和双侧后颞上沟(pSTS)在内的一组一致的脑区中产生了相当的激活。此外,我们还表明,这些脑区对另外两种句法对比不敏感。结合先前的成像和损伤研究来看,这些结果表明,句法移位的处理涉及一组一致的脑区,无论所讨论句子的表面属性如何,也无论任务是什么。