Friesema I H M, Veenstra M Y, Zwietering P J, Knottnerus J A, Garretsen H F L, Lemmens P H H M
Department of Health Care Studies, Section of Medical Sociology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 15;159(8):809-17. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh102.
Prior epidemiologic research revealing cardioprotective effects of alcohol intake has systematically neglected lifetime exposure to alcohol, which may cause serious bias in conclusions regarding drinking and heart disease risk. Departing from use of an earlier interview schedule, the authors of the present 1996-2001 cohort study developed a self-administered Lifetime Drinking History questionnaire (LDH-q). A total of 16,211 Dutch men and women older than age 45 years participated by completing the baseline questionnaire. A random sample of 3,255 men and women was used to determine the reliability and validity of the LDH-q. Test-retest reliability was assessed by means of the intraclass correlation coefficient and kappa scores. Correlations between lifetime and current intake scores were used to assess discriminant and convergent validity. Both reliability and validity appeared to be reasonably high compared with results obtained by using interview formats to measure lifetime alcohol intake. Reliability of the LDH-q was higher for men than for women, probably because of the more frequent and regular drinking of men. Indices of validity were similar for men (0.75) and women (0.70). Results show that the LDH-q can be a useful instrument in large-scale cohort studies.
先前揭示饮酒具有心脏保护作用的流行病学研究系统性地忽略了终生饮酒量,这可能会在有关饮酒与心脏病风险的结论中造成严重偏差。与使用早期访谈问卷不同,本1996 - 2001年队列研究的作者开发了一份自我管理的终生饮酒史问卷(LDH-q)。共有16211名45岁以上的荷兰男性和女性通过填写基线问卷参与了研究。抽取了3255名男性和女性的随机样本用于确定LDH-q的信度和效度。通过组内相关系数和kappa分数评估重测信度。终生饮酒量得分与当前饮酒量得分之间的相关性用于评估区分效度和聚合效度。与使用访谈形式测量终生饮酒量所获得的结果相比,信度和效度似乎都相当高。LDH-q在男性中的信度高于女性,这可能是因为男性饮酒更为频繁和规律。男性(0.75)和女性(0.70)的效度指标相似。结果表明,LDH-q在大规模队列研究中可能是一种有用的工具。