• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在环境暴露单元(EEU)中接受评估的受试者中,左西替利嗪和地氯雷他定治疗季节性过敏性鼻炎症状的临床疗效、起效时间及作用持续时间的比较

Comparative clinical efficacy, onset and duration of action of levocetirizine and desloratadine for symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in subjects evaluated in the Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU).

作者信息

Day J H, Briscoe M P, Rafeiro E, Ratz J D

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2004 Feb;58(2):109-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.0117.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.0117.x
PMID:15055856
Abstract

The Environmental Exposure Unit, an indoor pollen challenge system to test anti-allergic medications, was used to compare the onset and duration of action and the efficacy of levocetirizine and desloratadine, two recently developed H1-antagonists. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, qualified subjects were randomised to once-daily levocetirizine 5 mg (n = 141), desloratadine 5 mg (n = 140) or placebo (n = 92) and exposed to ragweed pollen on two consecutive days (7 h and 6 h). Symptoms were self-rated every 30 min. On both days, levocetirizine produced a greater improvement in the major symptom complex score (primary efficacy variable) than desloratadine (p = 0.015); both were better than placebo (p < 0.001). Levocetirizine acted earlier (1 h vs. 3 h) and produced greater symptom relief at 24 h than desloratadine (p = 0.003). Levocetirizine also alleviated nasal obstruction better than desloratadine (p = 0.007) on day 1; and better than placebo (p = 0.014) after the second dose on day 2, which was not observed with desloratadine. Levocetirizine and desloratadine were safe and well tolerated.

摘要

环境暴露单元是一种用于测试抗过敏药物的室内花粉激发系统,用于比较最近开发的两种H1拮抗剂左西替利嗪和地氯雷他定的起效时间、作用持续时间和疗效。在这项双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组研究中,符合条件的受试者被随机分为每日一次服用左西替利嗪5毫克(n = 141)、地氯雷他定5毫克(n = 140)或安慰剂(n = 92),并连续两天暴露于豚草花粉(7小时和6小时)。症状每30分钟进行一次自我评估。在这两天中,左西替利嗪在主要症状综合评分(主要疗效变量)方面比地氯雷他定有更大改善(p = 0.015);两者均优于安慰剂(p < 0.001)。左西替利嗪起效更早(1小时对3小时),在24小时时比地氯雷他定产生更大的症状缓解(p = 0.003)。在第1天,左西替利嗪缓解鼻塞的效果也比地氯雷他定更好(p = 0.007);在第2天第二次给药后,左西替利嗪比安慰剂更好(p = 0.014),而地氯雷他定未观察到这种情况。左西替利嗪和地氯雷他定安全且耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
Comparative clinical efficacy, onset and duration of action of levocetirizine and desloratadine for symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in subjects evaluated in the Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU).在环境暴露单元(EEU)中接受评估的受试者中,左西替利嗪和地氯雷他定治疗季节性过敏性鼻炎症状的临床疗效、起效时间及作用持续时间的比较
Int J Clin Pract. 2004 Feb;58(2):109-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.0117.x.
2
Efficacy of Desloratadine and Levocetirizine in Patients with Cedar Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.地氯雷他定和左西替利嗪治疗 cedar 花粉变应性鼻炎的疗效:一项随机、双盲研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2019;180(4):274-283. doi: 10.1159/000503065. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
A review of the efficacy of desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine in the treatment of nasal congestion in patients with allergic rhinitis.地氯雷他定、非索非那定和左西替利嗪治疗变应性鼻炎患者鼻充血疗效的综述
Clin Ther. 2009 May;31(5):921-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.017.
4
A direct comparison of the efficacy of antihistamines in SAR and PAR: randomised, placebo-controlled studies with levocetirizine and loratadine using an environmental exposure unit - the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC).抗组胺药在季节性变应性鼻炎(SAR)和常年性变应性鼻炎(PAR)中疗效的直接比较:使用环境暴露舱——维也纳激发试验舱(VCC)进行的左西替利嗪和氯雷他定随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jun;20(6):891-902. doi: 10.1185/030079904125003700.
5
A review of the evidence from comparative studies of levocetirizine and desloratadine for the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):146-7; author reply 147-9. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(06)00028-2.
6
Levocetirizine improves nasal obstruction and modulates cytokine pattern in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.左西替利嗪改善季节性变应性鼻炎患者的鼻塞并调节细胞因子模式:一项初步研究。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Jun;34(6):958-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01960.x.
7
Cetirizine, loratadine, or placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects after controlled ragweed pollen challenge in an environmental exposure unit.西替利嗪、氯雷他定或安慰剂用于季节性变应性鼻炎患者:在环境暴露舱中进行豚草花粉激发试验后的效果
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 May;101(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70172-1.
8
Desloratadine and levocetirizine improve nasal symptoms, airflow, and allergic inflammation in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a pilot study.地氯雷他定和左西替利嗪可改善常年性变应性鼻炎患者的鼻部症状、气流和变应性炎症:一项初步研究。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2005 Dec;5(13-14):1800-8. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2005.05.008. Epub 2005 Jun 13.
9
Montelukast with desloratadine or levocetirizine for the treatment of persistent allergic rhinitis.孟鲁司特联合地氯雷他定或左西替利嗪治疗持续性变应性鼻炎。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006 Nov;97(5):664-71. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61098-8.
10
Inhibition of allergen-induced wheal and flare reactions by levocetirizine and desloratadine.左西替利嗪和地氯雷他定对变应原诱导的风团及潮红反应的抑制作用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;65(2):172-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03009.x. Epub 2007 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards definitive management of allergic rhinitis: best use of new and established therapies.迈向过敏性鼻炎的确定性管理:新型和现有疗法的最佳应用
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 May 27;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00436-y. eCollection 2020.
2
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis.国际过敏与鼻科学学会共识声明:变应性鼻炎。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Feb;8(2):108-352. doi: 10.1002/alr.22073.
3
Onset of action for loratadine tablets for the symptomatic control of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults challenged with ragweed pollen in the Environmental Exposure Unit: a post hoc analysis of total symptom score.
在环境暴露单元中,对受豚草花粉激发的成年季节性过敏性鼻炎患者使用氯雷他定片进行症状控制的起效时间:总症状评分的事后分析
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan 16;14:5. doi: 10.1186/s13223-017-0227-4. eCollection 2018.
4
Sedative Effects of Levocetirizine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.左西替利嗪的镇静作用:一项随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2017 Feb;77(2):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0682-0.
5
Efficacy of fluticasone furoate nasal spray and levocetirizine in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis subjected to an artificial exposure chamber.糠酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂和左西替利嗪对日本雪松花粉症患者在人工暴露舱中的疗效。
J Drug Assess. 2013 Jul 26;2(1):94-105. doi: 10.3109/21556660.2013.829070. eCollection 2013.
6
Comparative Study of Apo-Cetirizine Single Therapy and Intermittent Sequential Therapy with Cetirizine, Loratadine and Chlorpheniramine in Allergic Rhinitis.阿伐斯汀单药治疗与西替利嗪、氯雷他定和氯苯那敏间歇性序贯治疗变应性鼻炎的比较研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Sep;68(3):329-33. doi: 10.1007/s12070-014-0753-z. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
7
Controlled Allergen Challenge Facilities and Their Unique Contributions to Allergic Rhinitis Research.过敏原控制挑战设施及其对变应性鼻炎研究的独特贡献。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015 Apr;15(4):11. doi: 10.1007/s11882-015-0514-4.
8
Pharmacology of antihistamines.抗组胺药的药理学
Indian J Dermatol. 2013 May;58(3):219-24. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.110832.
9
A four-way, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study to determine the efficacy and speed of azelastine nasal spray, versus loratadine, and cetirizine in adult subjects with allergen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis.一项四向、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究,旨在确定氮卓斯汀鼻喷剂相对于氯雷他定和西替利嗪在成人变应原性季节性过敏性鼻炎患者中的疗效和起效速度。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 May 1;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-16. eCollection 2013.
10
Pharmacology of antihistamines.抗组胺药的药理学。
World Allergy Organ J. 2011 Mar;4(3 Suppl):S22-7. doi: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e3181f385d9.