Bäuml Karl-Heinz, Kuhbandner Christof
Department of Experimental Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Dec;31(8):1188-97. doi: 10.3758/bf03195802.
Using DRM lists (Roediger & McDermott, 1995) in two experiments, we compared the effects of retrieval practice on a subset of the items and of the presentation of those items as retrieval cues at test on recall of the lists' critical items. In Experiment 1, the critical items were part of the studied lists, thus addressing these items' veridical recall; in Experiment 2, they were not studied, thus addressing these items' false recall. Three major results emerged. First, retrieval practice and part-list cuing reduced both veridical and false recall. Second, the two manipulations induced an integration effect in veridical recall, with substantial forgetting in lists with low false recall levels and no forgetting in lists with high false recall levels. Third, retrieval practice and part-list cuing created the same effects on recall, qualitatively and quantitatively. These results suggest that the detrimental effects of retrieval practice and part-list cuing were mediated by similar mechanisms. They are consistent with the view that not only retrieval-induced forgetting, but also part-list cuing is caused by inhibitory processes.
在两项实验中使用DRM列表(Roediger和McDermott,1995),我们比较了提取练习对列表中一部分项目的影响,以及在测试时将这些项目作为提取线索呈现对列表关键项目回忆的影响。在实验1中,关键项目是所学列表的一部分,因此涉及这些项目的真实回忆;在实验2中,它们未被学习,因此涉及这些项目的错误回忆。出现了三个主要结果。首先,提取练习和部分列表线索提示减少了真实回忆和错误回忆。其次,这两种操作在真实回忆中产生了一种整合效应,在错误回忆水平低的列表中有大量遗忘,而在错误回忆水平高的列表中没有遗忘。第三,提取练习和部分列表线索提示在回忆上产生了相同的效果,在定性和定量方面都是如此。这些结果表明提取练习和部分列表线索提示的有害影响是由相似的机制介导的。它们与这样一种观点一致,即不仅提取诱发遗忘,而且部分列表线索提示也是由抑制过程引起的。