• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Confidant and breast cancer patient reports of quality of life.

作者信息

Sandgren Ann K, Mullens Amy B, Erickson Shannon C, Romanek Kathleen M, McCaul Kevin D

机构信息

MeritCare Roger Maris Cancer Center, Fargo, ND 58122, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):155-60. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015287.90952.95.

DOI:10.1023/B:QURE.0000015287.90952.95
PMID:15058796
Abstract

It is well known that breast cancer patients report a temporary decline in their quality of life following diagnosis. Caregivers observe these changes, but only a few studies have examined the shared perceptions of patients and others concerning the patient's QOL. In this study, 112 women (96% white, 4% Native American), ages 34-84, rated their QOL 1-3 months after diagnosis on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT). The patients identified their main source of emotional support, and this confidant also completed the FACT. Most participants selected a spouse (60%); others selected a child (11%), friend (11%), or sibling (7%). Comparisons on five QOL subscales showed good agreement between patients and their confidants, with an average patient-confidant correlation across subscales of r = 0.34. At baseline, patients reported a higher overall QOL (M = 90.30) than their confidants (87.32), p = 0.05. At a 4-month follow up, significant patient/confidant difference was only obtained for the emotional well being subscale. Overall, the data attest to the reliability of the FACT, but they also suggest that confidants may overestimate how distressed patients feel, or that patients are reluctant to admit to distress. Such discrepancies could cause misguided social support efforts.

摘要

相似文献

1
Confidant and breast cancer patient reports of quality of life.
Qual Life Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):155-60. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015287.90952.95.
2
Hematological cancer patients' quality of life: self versus intimate or non-intimate confidant reports.
Psychooncology. 1999 Nov-Dec;8(6):546-52. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(199911/12)8:6<546::aid-pon410>3.0.co;2-q.
3
Social support and quality of life among Chinese breast cancer survivors: findings from a mixed methods study.社会支持与中国乳腺癌生存者的生活质量:一项混合方法研究的结果。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):788-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
4
Breast cancer in older women: quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in the 15 months after diagnosis.老年女性乳腺癌:诊断后15个月的生活质量与心理社会调适
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 1;21(21):4027-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.08.097.
5
Impact of cancer patients' quality of life on that of spouse caregivers.癌症患者的生活质量对配偶照顾者生活质量的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Jul;12(7):469-75. doi: 10.1007/s00520-004-0636-z. Epub 2004 Apr 30.
6
Early effect of surgery on quality of life in women with operable breast cancer.手术对可手术乳腺癌女性生活质量的早期影响。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul;36(7):468-72. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyl065.
7
Family caregivers of women with breast cancer in Iran report high psychological impact six months after diagnosis.伊朗乳腺癌女性患者的家庭护理人员报告称,在确诊六个月后受到了严重的心理影响。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Dec;18(6):630-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
8
Quality of life of husbands of women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性患者丈夫的生活质量
Psychooncology. 2006 Feb;15(2):109-20. doi: 10.1002/pon.928.
9
Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer.年轻乳腺癌女性的生活质量
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3322-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.130.
10
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.

引用本文的文献

1
A latent profile analysis of post-traumatic growth in spouses of breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者配偶创伤后成长的潜在剖面分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 4;13:1634910. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1634910. eCollection 2025.
2
Social network tie functions of social support and social influence and adult smoking abstinence.社会网络纽带在社会支持和社会影响方面的作用与成人戒烟。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0296458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296458. eCollection 2024.
3
Study on the cut-off point and the influencing factors of distress in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.组内相关系数:在评估评分者可靠性中的应用。
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
2
Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study.乳腺癌长期无病生存者的生活质量:一项随访研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Jan 2;94(1):39-49. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.1.39.
3
Quality of life in breast cancer patients--not enough attention for long-term survivors?乳腺癌患者的生活质量——长期幸存者未得到足够关注?
初诊乳腺癌患者心理困扰的切点及影响因素研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 20;15:1281469. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1281469. eCollection 2024.
4
Measuring the reliability of proxy respondents in behavioural assessments: an open question.代理应答者在行为评估中可靠性的衡量:一个开放性问题。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Oct;35(10):2173-2190. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02501-z. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
5
Caregiving and Shared Decision Making in Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.照顾和共同决策在乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者中的应用:系统综述。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jan 6;30(1):803-823. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010061.
6
God Attachment: Resource or Complication in Women's and Their Partners' Adjustment to the Threat of Breast Cancer.上帝依附:女性及其伴侣应对乳腺癌威胁的调整中的资源或并发症。
J Relig Health. 2021 Dec;60(6):4227-4248. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01331-5. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
7
Psychosocial Distress in Women With Breast Cancer and Their Partners and Its Impact on Supportive Care Needs in Partners.乳腺癌女性及其伴侣的心理社会困扰及其对伴侣支持性护理需求的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 23;11:564079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564079. eCollection 2020.
8
Assessing the proxy response bias of EQ-5D-3 L in general population: a study based on a large-scale representative household health survey using propensity score matching.评估 EQ-5D-3L 在一般人群中代理反应偏倚:一项基于倾向评分匹配的大规模代表性家庭健康调查研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 18;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01325-z.
9
Systematic review of caregiver responses for patient health-related quality of life in adult cancer care.成人癌症护理中照顾者对患者健康相关生活质量反应的系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2017 Aug;26(8):1925-1954. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1540-6. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
10
Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: a systematic review.乳腺癌特异性生活质量问卷的跨文化适应性及测量特性评估:一项系统综述
Qual Life Res. 2015 May;24(5):1179-95. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0840-3. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
Psychosomatics. 2001 Mar-Apr;42(2):117-23. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.2.117.
4
A comparison of patient and proxy symptom assessments in advanced cancer patients.晚期癌症患者中患者与代理人症状评估的比较。
Palliat Med. 1999 Jul;13(4):311-23. doi: 10.1191/026921699675854885.
5
Hematological cancer patients' quality of life: self versus intimate or non-intimate confidant reports.
Psychooncology. 1999 Nov-Dec;8(6):546-52. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(199911/12)8:6<546::aid-pon410>3.0.co;2-q.
6
Psychological adjustment in breast cancer: processes of emotional distress.乳腺癌患者的心理调适:情绪困扰的过程
Health Psychol. 1999 Jul;18(4):315-26. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.18.4.315.
7
Quality of life assessment in patients undergoing head and neck surgery as evaluated by lay caregivers.由非专业护理人员评估的接受头颈外科手术患者的生活质量
Laryngoscope. 1999 Jan;109(1):42-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199901000-00009.
8
Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.患者与代理人对欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)评分在评估癌症患者生活质量中的比较。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Jul;51(7):617-31. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00040-7.
9
Quality of life in long-term survivors of adult-onset cancers.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 May 6;90(9):656-67. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.9.656.
10
The use of significant others as proxy raters of the quality of life of patients with brain cancer.使用重要他人作为脑癌患者生活质量的代理评估者。
Med Care. 1997 May;35(5):490-506. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199705000-00006.