Hyde Abbey, Roche-Reid Bernadette
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Dublin, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Earlsfort Terrace, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(12):2613-23. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.014.
Almost since its inception, the concept of modernity was found to display tensions between its emancipatory potential to liberate the human subject from the manacles of tradition, and the application of reason to co-ordinate and control the natural world through scientific knowledge. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with 12 midwives about their role in the Irish maternity services and argues that, in a period of late modernity, these tensions continue to manifest themselves in the context of the midwife's role. Although the contemporary period is marked by a loss of faith in scientific truths, widely contested obstetric knowledge and practices continue to exercise mastery over nature while undermining a central feature of the midwife's role-the liberation of the autonomous subject. Drawing on the theory of communicative action developed by the critical theorist Jürgen Habermas, it is argued that the midwife's role in facilitating the autonomous choices of women through communicative action is impeded by the colonization of the lifeworld of labour and childbirth by the technocratic system of obstetrics. Although participants reported that their role involved empowering women and facilitating choices through dialogue congruent with communicative action, data also suggested that participants used strategic communication with clients aimed at achieving particular ends. The use of strategic communication was linked to the way in which the midwife's role is determined to a large extent by the practices and protocols of obstetrics, and also to the notion of client passivity. The instrumental rationality of obstetrics is linked to an outcome orientation to power and money, and a political economy perspective of medicine. It appears that communicative action between midwives and obstetricians is important in bringing about structural changes to facilitate the conditions for communicative action between midwives and their clients.
几乎自现代性概念诞生以来,人们就发现它在将人类主体从传统束缚中解放出来的解放潜力,与通过科学知识运用理性来协调和控制自然世界之间存在张力。本文对12名助产士进行了深入访谈,并对其进行定性分析,探讨她们在爱尔兰产科服务中的角色。研究认为,在晚期现代性时期,这些张力在助产士的角色背景中依然存在。尽管当代的特点是对科学真理失去信心,但备受争议的产科知识和实践仍在控制自然的同时,破坏了助产士角色的一个核心特征——自主主体的解放。借鉴批判理论家尤尔根·哈贝马斯提出的交往行为理论,本文认为,产科技术官僚体系对劳动和分娩生活世界的殖民化阻碍了助产士通过交往行为促进女性自主选择的角色发挥。尽管参与者表示她们的角色包括通过与交往行为一致的对话赋予女性权力并促进选择,但数据也表明,参与者会与客户进行旨在实现特定目的的策略性沟通。策略性沟通的使用与助产士角色在很大程度上由产科实践和规程决定的方式有关,也与客户被动性的观念有关。产科的工具理性与对权力和金钱的结果导向以及医学的政治经济学视角相关联。助产士与产科医生之间的交往行为似乎对于带来结构性变革以促进助产士与客户之间交往行为的条件很重要。