• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络分析作为评估和构建社区提供慢性病服务能力的一种工具。

Network analysis as a tool for assessing and building community capacity for provision of chronic disease services.

作者信息

Provan Keith G, Veazie Mark A, Teufel-Shone Nicolette I, Huddleston Carol

机构信息

School of Public Administration and Policy at the University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):174-81. doi: 10.1177/1524839903259303.

DOI:10.1177/1524839903259303
PMID:15090171
Abstract

A network analysis was conducted in spring 2000 by the Southwest Center for Health Promotion in the U.S.-Mexico border community of Douglas, Arizona. The purpose of the analysis was to assess the level of collaboration among the 23 public and not-for-profit agencies that provided health and human services for a broad range of chronic disease prevention, screening, and treatment services. Data were also collected on levels of trust and anticipated outcomes (benefits and draw-backs) of collaboration. The article presents the findings of the network analysis, focusing on its usefulness as a tool for evaluating efforts at building community capacity through enhanced interagency collaboration.

摘要

2000年春季,美国亚利桑那州道格拉斯市美墨边境社区的西南健康促进中心进行了一项网络分析。该分析的目的是评估23家为广泛的慢性病预防、筛查和治疗服务提供健康和人类服务的公共及非营利机构之间的合作水平。同时还收集了关于合作中的信任水平和预期结果(益处和弊端)的数据。本文介绍了网络分析的结果,重点关注其作为一种通过加强机构间合作来评估社区能力建设努力的工具的实用性。

相似文献

1
Network analysis as a tool for assessing and building community capacity for provision of chronic disease services.网络分析作为评估和构建社区提供慢性病服务能力的一种工具。
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):174-81. doi: 10.1177/1524839903259303.
2
Building community capacity around chronic disease services through a collaborative interorganizational network.通过跨组织协作网络提升围绕慢性病服务的社区能力。
Health Educ Behav. 2003 Dec;30(6):646-62. doi: 10.1177/1090198103255366.
3
Dialogue boxes: a tool for collaborative process evaluation.对话框:一种用于协作过程评估的工具。
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Apr;5(2):138-50. doi: 10.1177/1524839903260141.
4
Assessing local capacity for health intervention.评估当地的健康干预能力。
Eval Program Plann. 2008 May;31(2):145-59. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
5
Putting prevention in its place: the shift from clinic to community.找准预防的定位:从诊所到社区的转变
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):1012-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.1012.
6
Assessing interorganizational networks as a dimension of community capacity: illustrations from a community intervention to prevent lead poisoning.将组织间网络评估为社区能力的一个维度:来自预防铅中毒社区干预的实例
Health Educ Behav. 2004 Dec;31(6):808-21. doi: 10.1177/1090198104264220.
7
Implementation of youth development programs: promise and challenges.青年发展项目的实施:前景与挑战。
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Sep;37(3 Suppl):S61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.05.006.
8
[Measuring, evaluating and strategic development of community capacity and empowerment: introduction of a qualitative tool].[社区能力与赋权的测量、评估及战略发展:一种定性工具的介绍]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):764-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102959. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
9
An intersectoral network for chronic disease prevention: the case of the Alberta healthy living network.一个用于慢性病预防的跨部门网络:以艾伯塔省健康生活网络为例。
Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(4):153-61.
10
Conceptualizing the integration of HIV treatment and prevention: findings from a process evaluation of a community-based, national capacity-building intervention.艾滋病病毒治疗与预防整合的概念化:一项基于社区的国家能力建设干预措施过程评估的结果
Int J Public Health. 2009;54(3):133-41. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-8078-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the long-term public health and co-benefit impacts of an urban greenway intervention in the UK: a natural experiment evaluation - study protocol.调查英国城市绿道干预措施对长期公共卫生和协同效益的影响:一项自然实验评估——研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 6;15(7):e097530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097530.
2
Analyzing the accessibility of Rome's healthcare services via public transportation: a complex network approach.通过公共交通分析罗马医疗服务的可达性:一种复杂网络方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05060-7.
3
A Social Network Analysis of a Multi-sector Service System for Intimate Partner Violence in a Large US City.
美国一个大城市中亲密伴侣暴力多部门服务系统的社会网络分析
J Prev (2022). 2024 Jun;45(3):357-376. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00774-2. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
4
Exploring Intra and Interorganizational Integration Efforts Involving the Primary Care Sector - A Case Study from Ontario.探索涉及初级保健部门的组织内部和组织间整合工作——安大略省的一个案例研究
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Sep 8;22(3):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5541. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
5
The power of partnerships: state public health department multisector collaborations in major chronic disease programme areas in the United States.伙伴关系的力量:美国州公共卫生部门在重大慢性疾病规划领域的多部门合作。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jul 8;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00765-3.
6
A social network analysis of interactions about physical activity and nutrition among APPLE schools staff.对苹果学校工作人员之间有关体育活动和营养的互动进行的社会网络分析。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Mar 1;14:100763. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100763. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
NETWORK STRUCTURAL INFLUENCES ON THE ADOPTION OF EVIDENCE-BASED PREVENTION IN COMMUNITIES.网络结构对社区采用循证预防措施的影响
J Community Psychol. 2009 Sep;37(7):830-845. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20333. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
8
Network analysis of inter-organizational relationships and policy use among active living organizations in Alberta, Canada.加拿大艾伯塔省活跃生活组织间组织关系和政策使用的网络分析。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 9;17(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4661-5.
9
The Structure and Effectiveness of Health Systems: Exploring the Impact of System Integration in Rural China.卫生系统的结构与成效:探究中国农村地区系统整合的影响
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Aug 12;16(3):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2197.
10
Community Interagency Connections for Immigrant Worker Health Interventions, King County, Washington State, 2012-2013.华盛顿州金县移民工人健康干预社区跨部门合作,2012 - 2013年
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 2;13:E73. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160013.