Fujimoto Kayo, Volente Thomas W, Pentz Mary Ann
University of Southern California-Los Angeles.
J Community Psychol. 2009 Sep;37(7):830-845. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20333. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
This study examined the impact of key variables in coalition communication networks, centralization and density, on the adoption of evidence-based substance abuse prevention. Data were drawn from a network survey and a corresponding community leader survey that measured leader attitudes and practices toward substance abuse prevention programs. Two types of coalition networks were measured: advice-seeking and discussion relations. For each community, we computed network-level measurements (n = 20), and then used multiple linear regression. Results showed that adoption outcomes were associated with a decrease in centralization for the advice network and an increase in centralization for the discussion network, controlling for density. This suggests that community coalitions might consider decreasing their network density in such a manner that distributes power and influence among a broader base of coalition members to seek advice about programs while simultaneously discussing these programs in a more concentrated group to facilitate decisions about which programs to adopt.
本研究考察了联盟沟通网络中的关键变量——集权化和密度,对循证药物滥用预防措施采用情况的影响。数据来自一项网络调查以及一项相应的社区领袖调查,后者测量了领袖对药物滥用预防项目的态度和做法。测量了两种类型的联盟网络:寻求建议关系和讨论关系。对于每个社区,我们计算了网络层面的测量指标(n = 20),然后使用多元线性回归。结果表明,在控制密度的情况下,采用结果与建议网络集权化的降低以及讨论网络集权化的增加相关。这表明社区联盟可能会考虑以这样一种方式降低其网络密度,即在更广泛的联盟成员基础上分配权力和影响力,以便就项目寻求建议,同时在一个更集中的群体中讨论这些项目,以促进关于采用哪些项目的决策。