• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层任务结构中的任务切换:任务重复益处的脆弱性证据。

Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit.

作者信息

Lien Mei-Ching, Ruthruff Eric

机构信息

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 May;30(3):697-713. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.697.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.697
PMID:15099137
Abstract

This study examined how task switching is affected by hierarchical task organization. Traditional task-switching studies, which use a constant temporal and spatial distance between each task element (defined as a stimulus requiring a response), promote a flat task structure. Using this approach, Experiment 1 revealed a large switch cost of 238 ms. In Experiments 2-5, adjacent task elements were grouped temporally and/or spatially (forming an ensemble) to create a hierarchical task organization. Results indicate that the effect of switching at the ensemble level dominated the effect of switching at the element level. Experiments 6 and 7, using an ensemble of 3 task elements, revealed that the element-level switch cost was virtually absent between ensembles but was large within an ensemble. The authors conclude that the element-level task repetition benefit is fragile and can be eliminated in a hierarchical task organization.

摘要

本研究考察了任务切换是如何受到分层任务组织影响的。传统的任务切换研究在每个任务元素(定义为需要做出反应的刺激)之间使用恒定的时间和空间距离,从而形成了一种扁平的任务结构。采用这种方法,实验1揭示了238毫秒的巨大切换成本。在实验2 - 5中,相邻的任务元素在时间和/或空间上被分组(形成一个整体)以创建分层任务组织。结果表明,在整体层面上的切换效应主导了在元素层面上的切换效应。实验6和7使用了由3个任务元素组成的整体,结果显示,在不同整体之间,元素层面的切换成本几乎不存在,但在一个整体内部则很大。作者得出结论,元素层面的任务重复益处是脆弱的,并且在分层任务组织中可能会被消除。

相似文献

1
Task switching in a hierarchical task structure: evidence for the fragility of the task repetition benefit.分层任务结构中的任务切换:任务重复益处的脆弱性证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 May;30(3):697-713. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.697.
2
The role of response repetition in task switching.反应重复在任务切换中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Oct;34(5):1198-211. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1198.
3
Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries.区分切换成本不对称的抑制性和情景性加工解释。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009 Mar;63(1):8-23. doi: 10.1037/a0013222.
4
Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences.认知过程的分层控制:按顺序切换任务。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):623-40. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.623.
5
Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.使用随机任务序列探索任务集重新配置。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Mar;118(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.015. Epub 2004 Nov 25.
6
Task preparation and task repetition: two-component model of task switching.任务准备与任务重复:任务转换的双成分模型
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):764-78.
7
Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition.任务切换中与线索无关的特定任务表征:来自逆向抑制的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Sep;33(5):892-9. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.5.892.
8
Temporal preparation improves temporal resolution: evidence from constant foreperiods.时间准备可提高时间分辨率:来自恒定前周期的证据。
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Nov;70(8):1504-14. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1504.
9
Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.与反应速度、任务切换及即将使用的反应手相关的刺激前脑电图效应。
Biol Psychol. 2006 Apr;72(1):15-34. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
10
Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty.不对称切换成本与逆向抑制:在不同难度任务切换中的遗留激活与抑制
Can J Exp Psychol. 2008 Jun;62(2):91-100. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.62.2.91.

引用本文的文献

1
Sequential adjustments of task-pair control in dual-task contexts: Examining the role of repetition priming effects at the level of task-pair sets and abstract control states.双任务情境中任务对控制的顺序调整:在任务对集和抽象控制状态层面考察重复启动效应的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01694-0.
2
Chunking of Control: An Unrecognized Aspect of Cognitive Resource Limits.控制的组块化:认知资源限制中一个未被认识到的方面。
J Cogn. 2023 May 4;6(1):25. doi: 10.5334/joc.275. eCollection 2023.
3
The Higher, More Complicated: The Neural Mechanism of Hierarchical Task Switching on Prefrontal Cortex.
层次越高,越复杂:前额叶皮层上层次任务切换的神经机制
Brain Sci. 2022 May 14;12(5):645. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050645.
4
Endogenous control of task-order preparation in variable dual tasks.内源性控制变量双任务中任务顺序准备。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):345-363. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01259-2. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
5
We do as we construe: extended behavior construed as one task is executed as one cognitive entity.我们按自己的理解行事:被理解为一项任务的扩展行为会作为一个认知实体来执行。
Psychol Res. 2019 Feb;83(1):84-103. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1051-2. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
6
Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.提示认知灵活性:特定项目的转换准备学习。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Dec;43(12):1950-1960. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000420. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Hierarchical task organization in dual tasks: evidence for higher level task representations.双重任务中的分层任务组织:高级任务表征的证据。
Psychol Res. 2018 Jul;82(4):759-770. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0851-0. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
8
The Necessity of Rostrolateral Prefrontal Cortex for Higher-Level Sequential Behavior.腹外侧前额叶皮质对高级序列行为的必要性。
Neuron. 2015 Sep 23;87(6):1357-1368. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.08.026.
9
Chunking away task-switch costs: a test of the chunk-point hypothesis.消除任务切换成本:组块点假说的一项检验
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Jun;22(3):884-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0721-3.
10
Long-term memory and the control of attentional control.长期记忆与注意力控制的调控
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jul;72:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 17.