Vandebroek Ina, Van Damme Patrick, Van Puyvelde Luc, Arrazola Susana, De Kimpe Norbert
Faculty of Agriculture and Applied Biological Sciences, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Ghent B-9000, Belgium.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Aug;59(4):837-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.030.
Medicinal plant knowledge of two groups of traditional healers was thoroughly studied during a 2-year ethnobotanical survey in the Bolivian Andes (Quechua farmers from Apillapampa) and Amazon rainforest (Yuracaré-Trinitario slash-and-burn cultivators from Isiboro-Sécure National Park), respectively. Both areas represent ecologically and culturally diverse zones, differing in floristic diversity, physical accessibility to health care and degree of modernization, the latter evidenced by presence or intensity in use of modern services such as electricity, water distribution, and materials for house construction. It is generally believed that indigenous people have an impressive knowledge of useful plant species and that this knowledge reflects the plant wealth of their living environment. However, the present study shows that healers' knowledge of collected medicinal plants (expressed as percentage of plants known by name and use by the majority of healers) is higher in the Andean area characterised by a long history of anthropogenic activity, than in the biodiversity-rich rainforest (protected since 1965). Therefore, medicinal plant knowledge does not seem to depend on the level of plant diversity, degree of modernization or absence of Western health care infrastructure. Indeed, although Andean healers live in a floristically poorer environment, have adopted more modern services and have easier access to primary health care facilities, they are more knowledgeable about medicinal plants than rainforest healers who live isolated in an environment with considerable floristic/ecological variation and lack of Western health care. It is hypothesised that social factors underlying traditional medical practices (background of extensive family in traditional medicine) play an important role in transmission--and hence survival of knowledge on medicinal plants.
在一项为期两年的民族植物学调查中,分别对来自玻利维亚安第斯山脉(阿皮拉潘帕的盖丘亚族农民)和亚马逊雨林(伊西博罗-塞克国家公园的尤拉卡雷-特里尼塔里奥刀耕火种耕作者)的两组传统治疗师的药用植物知识进行了深入研究。这两个地区代表了生态和文化多样的区域,在植物多样性、获得医疗保健的实际可达性以及现代化程度方面存在差异,后者可通过电力、供水和房屋建筑材料等现代服务的使用情况或使用强度来体现。人们普遍认为,土著居民对有用植物种类有着令人印象深刻的了解,且这种知识反映了他们生活环境中的植物资源。然而,本研究表明,在以悠久人为活动历史为特征的安第斯地区,治疗师对所采集药用植物的了解(以大多数治疗师知晓名称和用途的植物百分比表示)高于生物多样性丰富的雨林地区(自1965年起受到保护)。因此,药用植物知识似乎并不取决于植物多样性水平、现代化程度或西方医疗保健基础设施的缺失情况。事实上,尽管安第斯地区的治疗师生活在植物种类较少的环境中,采用了更多现代服务且更容易获得初级医疗保健设施,但他们比生活在植物种类/生态变化显著且缺乏西方医疗保健的孤立环境中的雨林地区治疗师对药用植物更为了解。据推测,传统医疗实践背后的社会因素(传统医学中广泛的家庭背景)在药用植物知识的传承以及因此而得以留存方面发挥着重要作用。