Lotti Marcello
Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Toxicol Rev. 2003;22(4):203-15. doi: 10.2165/00139709-200322040-00003.
Despite the enormous number of reports on polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) toxicology, both the causal interpretation of epidemiological studies and the risk assessment of human exposures have been hampered by the lack of information on the pharmacokinetics of various PCB isomers and congeners. Thus, the assessment of exposure by means of measuring either total PCBs or individual congeners in the blood has so far been unsatisfactory. For example, the concentration and the pattern of congeners in the blood did not correlate with that at site(s) of action. In fact, the same levels of blood PCBs correlated with either toxic effects or no effects (both in clinical and epidemiological studies). In addition, when toxicity caused by PCBs was observed, the severity of the signs did not correlate with blood levels. Reasons for such a qualified failure are manifold and include different ways of reporting blood measurements, the different toxicological characteristics of each PCB, and different timing of sampling the blood, etc. Therefore, only limited conclusions can be drawn concerning what blood PCB measurements mean.
尽管关于多氯联苯(PCB)毒理学的报告数量众多,但流行病学研究的因果解释以及人类暴露风险评估一直因缺乏各种PCB异构体和同系物的药代动力学信息而受到阻碍。因此,迄今为止,通过测量血液中的总PCB或单个同系物来评估暴露情况并不令人满意。例如,血液中同系物的浓度和模式与作用部位的情况并不相关。实际上,相同水平的血液PCB在临床和流行病学研究中既可能与毒性作用相关,也可能与无影响相关。此外,当观察到PCB引起的毒性时,症状的严重程度与血液水平也不相关。导致这种有限成效的原因是多方面的,包括报告血液测量结果的不同方式、每种PCB不同的毒理学特征以及采集血液样本的不同时间等。因此,关于血液中PCB测量结果的意义只能得出有限的结论。