Groenewoud Johanna H, Van Der Heide Agnes, Tholen Alfons J, Schudel W Joost, Hengeveld Michiel W, Onwuteaka-Philipsen Bregje D, Van Der Maas Paul J, Van Der Wal Gerrit
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 Jul-Aug;26(4):323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2004.02.004.
The objective of this article is to describe the practice of psychiatric consultation with regard to explicit requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide in the Netherlands. Written questionnaires were sent to an unselected sample of 673 Dutch psychiatrists, about half of all such specialists in the Netherlands. The response rate was 83%. Of the respondents, 36% (199 of 549) had at least once been consulted about a patient's request for physician-assisted death. The annual number of such psychiatric consultations is estimated to be 400 (about 4% of all requests for physician-assisted death). About one in four consultations is initiated by another psychiatrist. Consultants were mainly asked to assess whether the patient had a treatable mental disorder (68%) or whether the patient's request was well considered (66%). Assessment of the influence of transference and countertransference was less frequently sought (24%). Of the 221 consultation cases described, 67 (30%) ended in euthanasia or assisted suicide, whereas another 124 (56%) did not. In most, but not all, cases where the patient's request for physician-assisted death was refused, the respondent had judged that the request was not well considered or that the patient had a treatable mental disorder, or that the decision-making was influenced by transference and countertransference. We conclude that psychiatric consultation for patients requesting physician-assisted death in the Netherlands is rare, as in other countries. The issue of psychiatric consultation with regard to requests for physician-assisted death, especially in patients with a physical disease, needs to be further addressed.
本文的目的是描述荷兰针对明确的安乐死或医生协助自杀请求进行精神科会诊的情况。向673名荷兰精神科医生(约占荷兰所有此类专科医生的一半)的非特定样本发放了书面问卷。回复率为83%。在受访者中,36%(549人中的199人)至少有一次就患者的医生协助死亡请求接受过会诊。据估计,此类精神科会诊的年次数为400次(约占所有医生协助死亡请求的4%)。约四分之一的会诊是由另一位精神科医生发起的。会诊医生主要被要求评估患者是否患有可治疗的精神障碍(68%)或患者的请求是否经过深思熟虑(66%)。对移情和反移情影响的评估较少被要求(24%)。在所描述的221例会诊病例中,67例(30%)以安乐死或协助自杀告终,而另外124例(56%)则没有。在大多数(但并非所有)患者的医生协助死亡请求被拒绝的病例中,受访者判断该请求未经深思熟虑,或患者患有可治疗的精神障碍,或决策受到移情和反移情的影响。我们得出结论,与其他国家一样,荷兰针对请求医生协助死亡的患者进行的精神科会诊很少见。关于医生协助死亡请求的精神科会诊问题,尤其是在患有躯体疾病的患者中,需要进一步探讨。