Vallbracht I, Rieber J, Oppermann M, Förger F, Siebert U, Helmke K
Krankenhaus München-Bogenhausen, Clinical Immunology/Rheumatology, Teaching Hospital of the University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1079-84. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.019877.
To assess the additional diagnostic and clinical value of the second test generation of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (CCP2) compared with rheumatoid factor isotypes (IgG-RF, IgA-RF, IgM-RF) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
This was a prospective study on 715 patients: rheumatoid arthritis (n = 295), degenerative or other inflammatory joint disease (n = 163), connective tissue disease or vasculitis (n = 103), and healthy controls (n = 154). Sera from each subject were tested for CCP2 and RF isotypes by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Agreement with clinical indices such as disease activity, joint destruction, disease duration, and other laboratory tests was assessed. Sensitivity and specificity of the tests were evaluated taking the clinical diagnosis as the gold standard.
Highest sensitivity was found for IgM-RF (66.4%) and CCP (64.4%). Highest specificity was achieved by CCP (97.1%) and IgG-RF (91.0%). In rheumatoid patients with high disease activity or severe joint damage, CCP was more often present (81.4% and 83.6%) than all RF isotypes. Of special diagnostic value was the detection of positive CCP in 34.5% of all patients with rheumatoid arthritis when all measured RF isotypes (IgG-RF, IgA-RF, and IgM-RF) were negative.
As a screening method for rheumatoid arthritis the IgM-RF and the CCP assays are superior to other RF isotypes. Positivity in the highly specific CCP ELISA supports the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. CCP proved to be a powerful diagnostic tool, especially in ambiguous cases or RF negative patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
评估第二代抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体(CCP2)检测相较于类风湿因子各亚型(IgG-RF、IgA-RF、IgM-RF)在类风湿关节炎患者中的额外诊断价值及临床价值。
这是一项针对715例患者的前瞻性研究,其中类风湿关节炎患者295例、退行性或其他炎性关节病患者163例、结缔组织病或血管炎患者103例以及健康对照者154例。采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法检测各受试者血清中的CCP2和RF各亚型。评估其与疾病活动度、关节破坏、病程及其他实验室检查等临床指标的一致性。以临床诊断为金标准评估检测的敏感性和特异性。
IgM-RF(66.4%)和CCP(64.4%)的敏感性最高。CCP(97.1%)和IgG-RF(91.0%)的特异性最高。在疾病活动度高或关节损伤严重的类风湿患者中,CCP阳性的比例(81.4%和83.6%)高于所有RF亚型。当所有检测的RF亚型(IgG-RF、IgA-RF和IgM-RF)均为阴性时,在所有类风湿关节炎患者中有34.5%检测到CCP阳性,具有特殊的诊断价值。
作为类风湿关节炎的筛查方法,IgM-RF和CCP检测优于其他RF亚型。高特异性的CCP ELISA检测呈阳性有助于类风湿关节炎的诊断。CCP被证明是一种强大的诊断工具,尤其在诊断不明确的病例或类风湿关节炎RF阴性患者中。