Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat.
作者信息
Barratt Alexandra, Wyer Peter C, Hatala Rose, McGinn Thomas, Dans Antonio L, Keitz Sheri, Moyer Virginia, For Gordon Guyatt
机构信息
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2004 Aug 17;171(4):353-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1021197.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat.循证医学学习者的小贴士：1. 相对危险度降低、绝对危险度降低及需治疗人数。
CMAJ. 2004 Aug 17;171(4):353-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1021197.
2
Presentation of evidence in continuing medical education programs: a mixed methods study.继续医学教育项目中的证据展示：一项混合方法研究。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Fall;30(4):221-8. doi: 10.1002/chp.20086.
3
4
Scientific inquiry: clinical statistics for primary care practitioners: Part II-absolute risk reduction, relative risk, relative risk reduction, and number needed to treat.
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2008 Apr;13(2):135-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2008.00146.x.
5
Expressing medicine side effects: assessing the effectiveness of absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to harm, and the provision of baseline risk information.表述药物副作用：评估绝对风险、相对风险和伤害所需人数的有效性，以及提供基线风险信息。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Oct;63(1-2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
6
[Using "number needed to treat" to interpret treatment effect].[使用“需治疗人数”来解释治疗效果]
Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2006 Jun;15(2):120-6.
7
Interpreting measures of treatment effect.解读治疗效果的衡量指标。
Hosp Med. 1998 Jun;59(6):499-501.
8
Annualized was found better than absolute risk reduction in the calculation of number needed to treat in chronic conditions.在慢性病治疗所需人数的计算中，发现年化率比绝对风险降低率更优。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.006. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
9
Evidence-based practice and the nurse practitioner.循证实践与执业护士
Nurse Pract. 2006 Oct;31(10):46-54.
10
Interpretation of absolute measures of disease risk in comparative research.比较研究中疾病风险绝对指标的解读。
Fam Med. 2007 Jun;39(6):432-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Predictive Modeling of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in RCTs: A Scoping Review.随机对照试验中异质性治疗效果的预测建模：一项范围综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522390. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22390.
2
The impact of solid organ transplantation on sexual dysfunction and infertility in older men and women: A Claims Based Study.实体器官移植对老年男性和女性性功能障碍及不孕不育的影响：一项基于索赔数据的研究。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01127-1.
3
Potential clinical impact of predictive modeling of heterogeneous treatment effects: scoping review of the impact of the PATH Statement.异质性治疗效果预测模型的潜在临床影响：对PATH声明影响的范围综述
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 21:2024.05.06.24306774. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.06.24306774.
4
Comment on "Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor on the Risks of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke and Mortality in Diabetic Patients".关于“钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂对糖尿病患者新发房颤、中风及死亡风险的比较”的评论
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Feb;38(1):201-202. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07527-z. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
5
Factors Associated With Changes in Alcohol Use During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Transition Among People With HIV in South Africa and Uganda.南非和乌干达艾滋病毒感染者在孕期和产后过渡期内饮酒变化的相关因素。
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:23259582231161029. doi: 10.1177/23259582231161029.
6
Interpreting results from randomized controlled trials: What measures to focus on in clinical practice.解读随机对照试验的结果：临床实践中应关注哪些指标。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Oct;37(15):3055-3058. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02454-7. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
7
The Wider Considerations in Closing Chronic Disease Gaps - Focus on Heart Failure and Implementation.在缩小慢性疾病差距方面的更广泛考虑因素——关注心力衰竭和实施。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(2):e120522204690. doi: 10.2174/1573403X18666220512160737.
8
Visualizing Time-Varying Effect in Survival Analysis: 5 Complementary Plots to Kaplan-Meier Curve.生存分析中时变效应的可视化：与 Kaplan-Meier 曲线互补的 5 个图。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Mar 29;2022:3934901. doi: 10.1155/2022/3934901. eCollection 2022.
9
True Differences in Poor Outcome Risks Between Revision and Primary Lumbar Spine Surgeries.翻修与初次腰椎手术在不良预后风险方面的真实差异。
HSS J. 2021 Jul;17(2):192-199. doi: 10.1177/1556331621995136. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Completeness of reporting and risks of overstating impact in cluster randomised trials: a systematic review.群组随机对照试验报告完整性与夸大影响风险的系统评价。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1163-e1168. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00200-X.
本文引用的文献
1
Tips for learning and teaching evidence-based medicine: introduction to the series.循证医学学习与教学小贴士：系列介绍
CMAJ. 2004 Aug 17;171(4):347-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031665.
2
Can we individualize the 'number needed to treat'? An empirical study of summary effect measures in meta-analyses.我们能否使“需治疗人数”个体化？一项关于荟萃分析中汇总效应量的实证研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):72-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.1.72.
3
When should an effective treatment be used? Derivation of the threshold number needed to treat and the minimum event rate for treatment.何时应使用有效治疗方法？治疗所需阈值数量和治疗最小事件发生率的推导。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Mar;54(3):253-62. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00347-x.
4
An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials.在临床试验的荟萃分析中，将控制率作为治疗效果预测指标的效果的实证研究。
Stat Med. 1998 Sep 15;17(17):1923-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980915)17:17<1923::aid-sim874>3.0.co;2-6.
5
6
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful nomogram in its proper context.需治疗人数：在恰当背景下的一种临床实用列线图。
BMJ. 1996 Feb 17;312(7028):426-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7028.426.
7
The framing effect of relative and absolute risk.相对风险和绝对风险的框架效应。
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Oct;8(10):543-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02599636.
8
Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews.循证采购：理解临床试验和系统评价的结果
BMJ. 1995 Oct 21;311(7012):1056-9; discussion 1059-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1056.
9
A randomized trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality results.一项关于普萘洛尔治疗急性心肌梗死患者的随机试验。I. 死亡率结果。
JAMA. 1982 Mar 26;247(12):1707-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.1982.03320370021023.
10
Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.17187例疑似急性心肌梗死患者静脉注射链激酶、口服阿司匹林、两者并用或两者均不用的随机试验：ISIS-2。ISIS-2（第二次心肌梗死存活国际研究）协作组
Lancet. 1988 Aug 13;2(8607):349-60.
Zotero 插件