Algom Daniel, Chajut Eran, Lev Shlomo
Tel Aviv University, Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv, Israel.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):323-38. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.323.
The role of Stroop processes in the emotional Stroop effect was subjected to a conceptual scrutiny augmented by a series of experiments entailing reading or lexical decision as well as color naming. The analysis showed that the Stroop effect is not defined in the emotional Stroop task. The experiments showed that reading, lexical decision, and color naming all are slower with emotional words and that this delay is immune to task-irrelevant variation and to changes in the relative salience of the words and the colors. The delay was absent when emotional and neutral words appeared in a single block. A threat-driven generic slowdown is implicated, not a selective attention mechanism associated with the classic Stroop effect.
通过一系列涉及阅读、词汇判断以及颜色命名的实验，对斯特鲁普加工过程在情绪性斯特鲁普效应中的作用进行了概念性审视。分析表明，在情绪性斯特鲁普任务中，斯特鲁普效应并未得到界定。实验表明，对于情绪性词语，阅读、词汇判断和颜色命名都更慢，并且这种延迟不受任务无关变化以及词语和颜色相对显著性变化的影响。当情绪性词语和中性词语出现在同一个组块中时，延迟不存在。这意味着存在一种由威胁驱动的普遍减速，而非与经典斯特鲁普效应相关的选择性注意机制。
