Gupta Aditya K, Boekhout Teun, Theelen Bart, Summerbell Richard, Batra Roma
Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Science Center, the University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Sep;42(9):4253-60. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.9.4253-4260.2004.
Malassezia yeasts are associated with several dermatological disorders. The conventional identification of Malassezia species by phenotypic methods is complicated and time-consuming, and the results based on culture methods are difficult to interpret. A comparative molecular approach based on the use of three molecular techniques, namely, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer, and sequencing of the D1 and D2 domains of the large-subunit ribosomal DNA region, was applied for the identification of Malassezia species. All species could be correctly identified by means of these methods. The results of AFLP analysis and sequencing were in complete agreement with each other. However, some discrepancies were noted when the molecular methods were compared with the phenotypic method of identification. Specific genotypes were distinguished within a collection of Malassezia furfur isolates from Canadian sources. AFLP analysis revealed significant geographical differences between the North American and European M. furfur strains.
马拉色菌酵母与多种皮肤病有关。通过表型方法对马拉色菌进行传统鉴定既复杂又耗时,而且基于培养方法的结果难以解释。一种基于三种分子技术的比较分子方法,即扩增片段长度多态性(AFLP)分析、内转录间隔区测序以及大亚基核糖体DNA区域D1和D2结构域测序,被用于鉴定马拉色菌。通过这些方法可以正确鉴定所有菌种。AFLP分析和测序结果完全一致。然而,当将分子方法与表型鉴定方法进行比较时,发现了一些差异。在一组来自加拿大的糠秕马拉色菌分离株中区分出了特定基因型。AFLP分析揭示了北美和欧洲糠秕马拉色菌菌株之间存在显著的地理差异。