Keinänen O, Takala J, Kari A
Department of Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.
Crit Care Med. 1992 Mar;20(3):360-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199203000-00012.
To compare continuous measurement of cardiac output by the Fick principle with the thermodilution cardiac output technique in hemodynamically unstable patients.
An open comparison of two methods.
Multidisciplinary ICU in a university hospital.
Eight patients after coronary bypass surgery and 13 patients with hyperdynamic septic shock. All patients were mechanically ventilated.
The continuous Fick cardiac output technique was compared with the thermodilution cardiac output using both warm and cold injection in the coronary artery bypass surgery patients and using warm injection only in the patients with hyperdynamic septic shock. The mean difference between the continuous cardiac output technique and all thermodilution measurements (n = 201) was 0.6 +/- 19%. There was a good correlation between the continuous cardiac output and the warm thermodilution technique (n = 125, r2 = .79; p less than .001). When consecutive measurements with warm and cold thermodilution were compared with the respective Fick-derived values (n = 76), the mean differences between the Fick-derived and the warm and cold thermodilution cardiac output values were 0.2 +/- 1.0 L/min and 0.3 +/- 1.0 L/min, respectively. The relationship between Fick-derived and both methods of thermodilution-derived cardiac output was relatively constant during different modes of ventilatory support. The correlation between the thermodilution measurements with cold and room temperature injectate was weak (r2 = .36; p less than .001), whereas a good correlation was observed between the respective Fick-derived values (r2 = .73; p less than .001). The mean difference between the warm and cold thermodilution cardiac output measurements was 0.1 +/- 1.1 L/min and between the corresponding Fick-derived measurements was 0.01 +/- 0.7 L/min.
Continuous measurement of cardiac output by the Fick principle offers a convenient, reproducible method for hemodynamic monitoring of unstable patients. The variation between the two tested thermodilution techniques is likely to reflect relatively rapid dynamic variation of cardiac output, which is filtered in the 1-min average of cardiac output obtained by the continuous Fick technique.
比较在血流动力学不稳定患者中,运用菲克原理连续测量心输出量与热稀释法测量心输出量的情况。
两种方法的开放性比较。
大学医院的多学科重症监护病房。
8例冠状动脉搭桥术后患者和13例高动力型感染性休克患者。所有患者均接受机械通气。
在冠状动脉搭桥手术患者中,将连续菲克心输出量测量技术与使用温注射和冷注射的热稀释心输出量测量技术进行比较;在高动力型感染性休克患者中,仅使用温注射。连续心输出量测量技术与所有热稀释测量值(n = 201)之间的平均差异为0.6±19%。连续心输出量与温热稀释技术之间存在良好的相关性(n = 125,r2 = 0.79;p < 0.001)。当将温热稀释和冷热稀释的连续测量值与各自的菲克衍生值进行比较时(n = 76),菲克衍生值与温热稀释和冷热稀释心输出量值之间的平均差异分别为0.2±1.0 L/分钟和0.3±1.0 L/分钟。在不同的通气支持模式下,菲克衍生值与两种热稀释衍生心输出量方法之间的关系相对恒定。冷注射和室温注射的热稀释测量值之间的相关性较弱(r2 = 0.36;p < 0.001),而各自的菲克衍生值之间观察到良好的相关性(r2 = 0.73;p < 0.001)。温热稀释和冷热稀释心输出量测量值之间的平均差异为0.1±1.1 L/分钟,相应的菲克衍生测量值之间的平均差异为0.01±0.7 L/分钟。
运用菲克原理连续测量心输出量为不稳定患者的血流动力学监测提供了一种方便、可重复的方法。两种测试的热稀释技术之间的差异可能反映了心输出量相对快速的动态变化,但这种变化在通过连续菲克技术获得的1分钟心输出量平均值中被过滤掉了。