Beck J Gayle, Coffey Scott F, Palyo Sarah A, Gudmundsdottir Berglind, Miller Luana M, Colder Craig R
Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2004 Sep;16(3):289-98. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.289.
This study examined the factor structure, internal consistency, concurrent validity, discriminant validity, and discriminative validity of the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI; E. B. Foa, A. Ehlers, D. M. Clark, D. F. Tolin, and S. M. Orsillo, 1999) in a sample of 112 individuals who had experienced a serious motor vehicle accident. Results generally supported the 3-factor structure of the PTCI: (a) Negative Cognitions About Self, (b) Negative Cognitions About the World, and (c) Self-Blame. Subscales reflecting negative thoughts of the self and world showed adequate internal consistency, as well as good concurrent, discriminant, and discriminative validity. However, difficulties with the subscale representing self-blame emerged, specifically poor concurrent and discriminant validity. Potential reasons for this finding are discussed. The PTCI seems to be a promising measure of negative and dysfunctional posttrauma cognitions, which deserves continuing attention.
本研究在112名经历过严重机动车事故的个体样本中,检验了创伤后认知量表(PTCI;E.B.福阿、A.埃勒斯、D.M.克拉克、D.F.托林和S.M.奥尔西洛,1999年)的因子结构、内部一致性、同时效度、区分效度和鉴别效度。结果总体上支持PTCI的三因子结构:(a)对自我的消极认知,(b)对世界的消极认知,以及(c)自我责备。反映自我和世界消极想法的分量表显示出足够的内部一致性,以及良好的同时效度、区分效度和鉴别效度。然而,代表自我责备的分量表出现了问题,特别是同时效度和区分效度较差。讨论了这一发现的潜在原因。PTCI似乎是一种有前景的创伤后消极和功能失调认知的测量工具,值得持续关注。