Napadow Vitaly, Makris Nikos, Liu Jing, Kettner Norman W, Kwong Kenneth K, Hui Kathleen K S
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Mar;24(3):193-205. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20081.
The goal of this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study was to compare the central effects of electroacupuncture at different frequencies with traditional Chinese manual acupuncture. Although not as time-tested as manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture does have the advantage of setting stimulation frequency and intensity objectively and quantifiably. Manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture at 2 Hz and 100 Hz, and tactile control stimulation were carried out at acupoint ST-36. Overall, electroacupuncture (particularly at low frequency) produced more widespread fMRI signal increase than manual acupuncture did, and all acupuncture stimulations produced more widespread responses than did our placebo-like tactile control stimulation. Acupuncture produced hemodynamic signal increase in the anterior insula, and decrease in limbic and paralimbic structures including the amygdala, anterior hippocampus, and the cortices of the subgenual and retrosplenial cingulate, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, frontal, and temporal poles, results not seen for tactile control stimulation. Only electroacupuncture produced significant signal increase in the anterior middle cingulate cortex, whereas 2-Hz electroacupuncture produced signal increase in the pontine raphe area. All forms of stimulation (acupuncture and control) produced signal increase in SII. These findings support a hypothesis that the limbic system is central to acupuncture effect regardless of specific acupuncture modality, although some differences do exist in the underlying neurobiologic mechanisms for these modalities, and may aid in optimizing their future usage in clinical applications.
这项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究的目的是比较不同频率电针与传统中医手法针刺的中枢效应。尽管电针不像手法针刺那样经过长期验证,但它确实具有客观且可量化地设定刺激频率和强度的优势。在足三里穴进行手法针刺、2赫兹和100赫兹的电针以及触觉对照刺激。总体而言,电针(尤其是低频电针)比手法针刺产生更广泛的fMRI信号增强,并且所有针刺刺激都比我们类似安慰剂的触觉对照刺激产生更广泛的反应。针刺在前岛叶产生血流动力学信号增强,在包括杏仁核、前海马以及膝下扣带回、压后扣带回、腹内侧前额叶皮质、额叶和颞叶极的边缘和边缘旁结构中产生信号减弱,触觉对照刺激未出现这些结果。只有电针在前中部扣带回皮质产生显著的信号增强,而2赫兹电针在脑桥中缝区域产生信号增强。所有形式的刺激(针刺和对照)在第二躯体感觉区均产生信号增强。这些发现支持这样一种假设,即无论具体针刺方式如何,边缘系统都是针刺效应的核心,尽管这些方式的潜在神经生物学机制存在一些差异,并且可能有助于优化它们在临床应用中的未来使用。