Ludvig Elliot A, Staddon John E R
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Oct;30(4):299-316. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.30.4.299.
On many cyclic-interval schedules, animals adjust their postreinforcement pause to follow the interval duration (temporal tracking). Six pigeons were trained on a series of square-wave (2-valued) interval schedules (e.g., 12 fixed-interval [FI] 60, 4 FI 180). Experiment 1 showed that pigeons track square-wave schedules, except those with a single long interval per cycle. Experiments 2 and 3 established that tracking and nontracking are learned and both can transfer from one cyclic schedule to another. Experiment 4 demonstrated that pigeons track a schedule with a single short interval per cycle, suggesting that a dual process--cuing and tracking--is necessary to explain behavior on these schedules. These findings suggest a potential explanation for earlier results that reported a failure to track square-wave schedules.
在许多循环间隔程序中,动物会调整其强化后停顿时间以适应间隔时长(时间追踪)。六只鸽子接受了一系列方波(二值)间隔程序的训练(例如,12个固定间隔[FI]60、4个FI180)。实验1表明,鸽子能够追踪方波程序,但每个周期只有一个长间隔的程序除外。实验2和3确定,追踪和不追踪是习得的,并且两者都可以从一个循环程序转移到另一个循环程序。实验4表明,鸽子能够追踪每个周期只有一个短间隔的程序,这表明需要一个双重过程——提示和追踪——来解释这些程序中的行为。这些发现为早期报告的未能追踪方波程序的结果提供了一种潜在的解释。