Dunn R
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, Calexico, California 92231.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):163-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-163.
Response-contingent timeouts of equal duration and frequency were added to both alternatives of unequal concurrent schedules of reinforcement. For each of 4 pigeons in Experiment 1, relative response rates generally became less extreme as the frequency of timeout increased. In Experiment 2, relative response rates consistently approached indifference as the duration of timeout was increased. Variation in time allocation was less consistent in both experiments. Absolute response rates did not vary with the timeout contingency in either experiment. In a third experiment, neither measure of choice varied systematically when the duration of a postreinforcement blackout was varied. In contrast to the present results, preference has been shown to vary directly with the parameters of shock delivery in related procedures. The pattern of results in the first two experiments follows that obtained with other manipulations of the overall rate of reinforcement in concurrent schedules. The results of the third experiment suggest that an intertrial interval following reinforcement is not a critical feature of the overall rate of reinforcement.
在不等的并发强化程序的两个选项中,都添加了持续时间和频率相等的依反应而定的超时。对于实验1中的4只鸽子,随着超时频率的增加,相对反应率通常变得不那么极端。在实验2中,随着超时持续时间的增加,相对反应率一直接近无差异状态。在两个实验中,时间分配的变化都不太一致。在两个实验中,绝对反应率都没有随超时条件而变化。在第三个实验中,当强化后黑屏的持续时间变化时,两种选择度量都没有系统地变化。与目前的结果相反,在相关程序中,偏好已被证明与电击传递的参数直接相关。前两个实验的结果模式与并发程序中对强化总速率的其他操作所获得的结果一致。第三个实验的结果表明,强化后的试间间隔不是强化总速率的关键特征。