D'Souza L, Garcia J
Mother and Infant Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Child Care Health Dev. 2004 Nov;30(6):599-611. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00471.x.
Tackling health inequalities is high on the political agenda of the Labour government. The government wants to reduce inequalities through policies based on evidence, the health of childbearing women and their babies being priority areas for action. National Service Frameworks (NSFs) are being set up to ensure high quality services for all groups. The External Working Group looking into maternity services for the Children's NSF seeks evidence upon which to plan strategies for all women, while focusing attention on the most disadvantaged. Wide differentials are noted between high- and low-income groups in the outcomes of pregnancy and the health of babies. The worst outcomes appear to be concentrated in small subgroups of disadvantaged women.
To report on a review of studies of interventions improving perinatal outcomes for disadvantaged women, to inform policy and practice around the organization and delivery of statutory services in the UK.
We searched six relevant databases for reviews, intervention studies, audits and descriptions of services reporting outcomes for disadvantaged groups of women, published between 1990 and 2003. Synthesis was performed around what works and what does not work. Gaps in the evidence base were identified.
We found limited evidence of effective and promising interventions for childbearing women from minority ethnic groups, women experiencing domestic violence, women with mental health illness and HIV infected women. Few studies were well-designed or powered to detect effectiveness. There were no studies of interventions for women prisoners, homeless women and travellers.
Searching for intervention studies primarily by participant subgroup has brought in evidence from few well-designed studies on which to plan policy. Combining this approach with searching for intervention studies addressing behaviour like smoking, and needs like social support, may provide further evidence to tackle inequalities in the perinatal period.
解决健康不平等问题在工党政府的政治议程上占据重要位置。政府希望通过基于证据的政策来减少不平等现象,育龄妇女及其婴儿的健康是行动的优先领域。正在建立国家服务框架,以确保为所有群体提供高质量服务。儿童国家服务框架的外部工作组在研究孕产妇服务时,寻求可为所有妇女制定策略提供依据的证据,同时将重点放在最弱势的群体上。高收入和低收入群体在妊娠结局和婴儿健康方面存在很大差异。最糟糕的结局似乎集中在处境不利妇女的小群体中。
报告对改善弱势妇女围产期结局的干预措施研究的综述,为英国法定服务的组织和提供方面的政策及实践提供信息。
我们检索了六个相关数据库,查找1990年至2003年期间发表的、针对弱势妇女群体报告结局的综述、干预研究、审计及服务描述。围绕哪些措施有效、哪些无效进行了综合分析。确定了证据基础方面的差距。
我们发现,对于少数族裔育龄妇女、遭受家庭暴力的妇女、患有精神疾病的妇女以及感染艾滋病毒的妇女,有效且有前景的干预措施证据有限。很少有研究设计良好或有足够的样本量来检测有效性。没有针对女囚犯、无家可归妇女和旅行者的干预措施研究。
主要按参与者亚组搜索干预研究,所获得的证据来自少数设计良好的研究,难以据此制定政策。将这种方法与搜索针对吸烟等行为及社会支持等需求的干预研究相结合,可能会为解决围产期不平等问题提供更多证据。