Signoretto Caterina, Burlacchini Gloria, Lleò Maria del Mar, Pruzzo Carla, Zampini Massimiliano, Pane Luigi, Franzini Giorgio, Canepari Pietro
Sezione di Microbiologia, Dipartimento di Patologia, Università di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Nov;70(11):6892-6. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6892-6896.2004.
The presence of enterococci in lake and seawater in an 18-month survey comparing molecular (PCR and quantitative PCR) and culture methods was evaluated, as well as the possibility that zooplankton could act as reservoirs for enterococci. Samples of both water and zooplankton were collected monthly from a Lake Garda site and an Adriatic Sea site. In lake water, the positive samples numbered 13 of 54 (24%) by culture and 32 of 54 (59%) when PCR was applied. In seawater, they numbered 0 of 51 by culture and 18 of 51 (35%) by PCR. Enterococci were found either totally bound to plankton or totally in water, depending on the presence or absence of plankton, respectively. These results clearly indicate that the PCR assay is a powerful tool for detecting fecal indicators and pathogens in the environment, thus providing a much more sensitive method than culture.
在一项为期18个月的调查中,评估了加尔达湖和海水样本中肠球菌的存在情况,比较了分子生物学方法(PCR和定量PCR)和培养方法,并研究了浮游动物作为肠球菌宿主的可能性。每月从加尔达湖和亚得里亚海的采样点采集水样和浮游动物样本。在湖水中,通过培养法检测的54个样本中有13个呈阳性(24%),而采用PCR法时54个样本中有32个呈阳性(59%)。在海水中,通过培养法检测的51个样本均为阴性,而采用PCR法时51个样本中有18个呈阳性(35%)。根据浮游动物的有无,肠球菌要么完全附着在浮游生物上,要么完全存在于水中。这些结果清楚地表明,PCR检测法是检测环境中粪便指示菌和病原体的有力工具,因此比培养法更为灵敏。