临床研究报告中误导性声明检测用户指南。
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports.
作者信息
Montori Victor M, Jaeschke Roman, Schünemann Holger J, Bhandari Mohit, Brozek Jan L, Devereaux P J, Guyatt Gordon H
机构信息
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester MN, USA.
出版信息
BMJ. 2004 Nov 6;329(7474):1093-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7474.1093.
Abstract
Plenty of advice is available to help readers identify studies with weak methods, but would you be able to identify misleading claims in a report of a well conducted study?
摘要
有很多建议可帮助读者识别方法薄弱的研究，但你能在一项实施良好的研究报告中识别出误导性的说法吗？
相似文献
1
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports.临床研究报告中误导性声明检测用户指南。
BMJ. 2004 Nov 6;329(7474):1093-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7474.1093.
2
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in research: misleading claims may be symptom of even more serious flaws.研究中误导性主张的检测用户指南：误导性主张可能是更严重缺陷的征兆。
BMJ. 2005 Jan 15;330(7483):145; author reply 146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7483.145.
3
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in research: meta-analyses have led to misleading claims in the past.研究中误导性声明检测用户指南：过去的荟萃分析曾导致误导性声明。
BMJ. 2005 Jan 15;330(7483):145; author reply 146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7483.145-b.
4
Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in research: discussion section helps redress the balance.研究中检测误导性主张的用户指南：讨论部分有助于纠正平衡。
BMJ. 2005 Jan 15;330(7483):145; author reply 146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7483.145-a.
5
Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.生物医学研究文章中你也能发现的20个统计错误。
Croat Med J. 2004 Aug;45(4):361-70.
6
Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?生物医学期刊中的数据呈现与统计检验的应用：我们能达成共识吗？
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011 May;38(5):285-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2011.05508.x.
7
Conducting clinical research and getting the report published.开展临床研究并发表报告。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 Mar-Apr;49(2):109-11. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.01.004.
8
The top 10 plastic surgery research mistakes-what they are and how to avoid them.十大整形手术研究误区——它们是什么以及如何避免。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Dec;62(12):1709-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.06.047.
9
Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.治疗效果的大小及其对临床研究和实践的重要性。
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):990-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.014. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Factors enhancing implementation of occupational safety and health management systems in manufacturing industry of Mutare, Zimbabwe.津巴布韦穆塔雷制造业中促进职业安全与健康管理体系实施的因素。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;13:1450567. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1450567. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatments and interventions for smoking cessation.对戒烟治疗与干预的系统评价和荟萃分析摘要中自旋的评估。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2021 May 20;7:35. doi: 10.18332/tpc/134238. eCollection 2021.
3
Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research.独立讨论部分可提高已发表研究的推理可重复性。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):413-420. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature.生物医学文献中的研究结果的伪造和歪曲。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2613-2619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710755115.
5
Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries.临床医生了解治疗效果的规模吗？一项针对8个国家的随机调查。
CMAJ. 2016 Jan 5;188(1):25-32. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150430. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
6
Concurrence of Intraoperative Hypotension, Low Minimum Alveolar Concentration, and Low Bispectral Index Is Associated with Postoperative Death.术中低血压、低最低肺泡浓度和低脑电双频指数同时出现与术后死亡相关。
Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):775-85. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000822.
7
Comparator bias: why comparisons must address genuine uncertainties.对照偏倚：为何比较必须解决真正的不确定性。
J R Soc Med. 2013 Jan;106(1):30-3. doi: 10.1177/0141076812474779.
8
Discussing study limitations in reports of biomedical studies- the need for more transparency.探讨生物医学研究报告中的研究局限性——提高透明度的必要性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Feb 23;10:23. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-23.
9
Outcomes, outcomes, every where, nor any stop to think?结果，结果，满眼都是结果，却无暇停下来思考？
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov;26(11):1239-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1852-0.
10
Interpreting systematic reviews: are we ready to make our own conclusions? A cross-sectional study.解读系统评价：我们是否已经准备好得出自己的结论？一项横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2011 Mar 30;9:30. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-30.
本文引用的文献
1
Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?随机药物试验中资金与结论的关联：是治疗效果还是不良事件的反映？
JAMA. 2003 Aug 20;290(7):921-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.7.921.
2
Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.制药行业赞助与研究结果及质量：系统评价
BMJ. 2003 May 31;326(7400):1167-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167.
3
A comparison of outcomes with angiotensin-converting--enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for hypertension in the elderly.老年高血压患者使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和利尿剂的疗效比较。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):583-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021716.
4
Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.生物医学研究中经济利益冲突的范围与影响：一项系统综述
JAMA. 2003;289(4):454-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.4.454.
5
Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.发表在普通医学期刊上的对照试验报告中的讨论部分。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2799-801. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2799.
6
Intravascular gamma radiation for in-stent restenosis in saphenous-vein bypass grafts.血管内伽马射线治疗隐静脉搭桥血管内支架置入术后再狭窄
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 18;346(16):1194-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012579.
7
Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes.血管紧张素受体拮抗剂厄贝沙坦对2型糖尿病肾病患者的肾脏保护作用。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 20;345(12):851-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011303.
8
Colloid use for fluid resuscitation: evidence and spin.胶体用于液体复苏：证据与误导信息
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Aug 7;135(3):205-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-3-200108070-00013.
9
Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals.审视审稿人：三本二级期刊的报告质量
CMAJ. 2001 May 29;164(11):1573-6.
10
Zotero 插件