斯坦福出勤主义量表的信度和效度。

Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale.

作者信息

Turpin Robin S, Ozminkowski Ronald J, Sharda Claire E, Collins James J, Berger Marc L, Billotti Gary M, Baase Catherine M, Olson Michael J, Nicholson Sean

机构信息

USHH Outcomes Research and Management, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania 19486-0004, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Nov;46(11):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000144999.35675.a0.

DOI:10.1097/01.jom.0000144999.35675.a0

PMID:15534499

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study reports the reliability and validity of the 13-item Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS). The SPS differs from similar scales by focusing on knowledge-based and production-based workers.

METHODS

Data were obtained from administrative and medical claims databases and from a survey that incorporated the SPS, SF-36, and the Work Limitations Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Sixty-three percent (7797) of employees responded. Cronbach's alpha (0.83) indicates adequate reliability. Factor analysis identified two underlying factors, "completing work" and "avoiding distraction." Knowledge-based workers load on "completing work" (alpha = 0.97), whereas production-based workers load on "avoiding distraction" (alpha = 0.98). There were significant and positive relationships between the SPS, SF-36, and Work Limitations Questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPS demonstrates a high degree of reliability and validity and may be ideal for employers who seek a single scale to measure health-related productivity in a diverse employee population.

摘要

目的

本研究报告了13项斯坦福出勤主义量表（SPS）的信度和效度。SPS与类似量表的不同之处在于它关注基于知识和基于生产的工作者。

方法

数据来自行政和医疗理赔数据库以及一项纳入了SPS、SF-36和工作限制问卷的调查。

结果

63%（7797名）员工做出了回应。克朗巴哈系数（0.83）表明信度充足。因子分析确定了两个潜在因子，即“完成工作”和“避免分心”。基于知识的工作者在“完成工作”因子上的载荷较高（α = 0.97），而基于生产的工作者在“避免分心”因子上的载荷较高（α = 0.98）。SPS、SF-36和工作限制问卷之间存在显著的正相关关系。