Tsuchiya Satoko, Nikaido Toru, Sonoda Hidekazu, Foxton Richard M, Tagami Junji
Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
J Adhes Dent. 2004 Autumn;6(3):183-90.
To observe the ultrastructure of the dentin-adhesive interface after in vitro sequential challenge by acidic and basic chemicals around adhesive restorations.
Box-shaped cavities were prepared in bovine root dentin and restored as follows: Reactmer Bond and Reactmer Paste (RB/RP), Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil AP-X (SE/APX), ABF (experimental) and APX (ABF/APX), Single Bond and APX (SB/APX). After the specimens were stored in water for 1 week, the integrity of the bonds tested by sequential immersion were placed in an artificial demineralizing solution (pH 4.5) for 20 min and in 5% NaOCl for 20 min. The specimens were sectioned, polished, then argon-ion etched for 7 min, and gold sputter coated for SEM examination of the dentin-adhesive interface.
The morphological results indicated tight bonding between the cavity wall dentin and the adhesive. For the fluoride-releasing restoration, RB/RP, a thick acid-resistant zone was clearly observed adjacent to the restoration; however, the bonding resin, RB, was partially degraded by the acid-base challenge. For SE/APX, ABF/APX and SB/APX, the bonding resins were resistant to the acid-base challenge. With the self-etching adhesive systems, SE and ABF, a thin band of acid-base resistant dentin less than 1 microm thick was observed beneath the hybrid layer. With the wet bonding system, SB, the hybrid layer was partially degraded by the acid-base challenge.
SEM observation is useful for observing the reactions of adhesives to acid-base challenge. Prevention of secondary caries around a restoration may be influenced by the physical properties of the restorative and adhesive materials, quality of the hybrid layer, and fluoride-release.
观察粘结修复体周围经酸性和碱性化学物质体外序贯刺激后牙本质-粘结剂界面的超微结构。
在牛牙根牙本质中制备盒状洞型并按以下方式修复:Reactmer Bond和Reactmer Paste(RB/RP)、Clearfil SE Bond和Clearfil AP-X(SE/APX)、ABF(实验性)和APX(ABF/APX)、Single Bond和APX(SB/APX)。将标本在水中储存1周后,通过序贯浸泡测试粘结完整性,将其置于人工脱矿溶液(pH 4.5)中20分钟,然后置于5%次氯酸钠中20分钟。将标本切片、抛光,然后进行7分钟的氩离子蚀刻,再进行金溅射镀膜,用于扫描电镜观察牙本质-粘结剂界面。
形态学结果表明洞壁牙本质与粘结剂之间粘结紧密。对于释放氟的修复体RB/RP,在修复体附近清晰观察到一个厚的耐酸区;然而,粘结树脂RB在酸碱刺激下部分降解。对于SE/APX、ABF/APX和SB/APX,粘结树脂对酸碱刺激具有抗性。对于自酸蚀粘结系统SE和ABF,在混合层下方观察到一条厚度小于1微米的耐酸碱牙本质薄带。对于湿粘结系统SB,混合层在酸碱刺激下部分降解。
扫描电镜观察有助于观察粘结剂对酸碱刺激的反应。修复体周围继发龋的预防可能受修复材料和粘结材料的物理性能、混合层质量以及氟释放的影响。