Derry Paula S
Womens Health Issues. 2004 Nov-Dec;14(6):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2004.07.004.
The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized clinical trial of hormone therapy (HT) and primary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) found overall harm rather than benefit from medication. This surprised professionals, made newspaper headlines, and changed prescription practices. However, the pre-WHI research literature was strongly supportive of a prevention role for HT only when interpreted in particular ways. This article reviews the history of research on HT and CHD prevention preceding WHI and the initial response to WHI in terms of underlying decision-making-rules and values about how to design and interpret research, especially rules and values fostering a positive view of HT's benefits for disease prevention even in the face of neutral, ambiguous, and negative evidence.
妇女健康倡议(WHI)关于激素疗法(HT)与冠心病(CHD)一级预防的随机临床试验发现,药物治疗总体上带来的是危害而非益处。这令专业人士感到惊讶,成为报纸头条,并改变了处方习惯。然而,仅当以特定方式解读时,WHI之前的研究文献才强烈支持HT在预防方面的作用。本文回顾了WHI之前关于HT与CHD预防的研究历史,以及从潜在的决策规则和关于如何设计与解读研究的价值观方面对WHI的初步反应,尤其是那些即便面对中性、模糊和负面证据仍支持HT对疾病预防有益这一积极观点的规则和价值观。