Macleod A F, Boulton A J, Owens D R, Van Rooy P, Van Gerven J M, Macrury S, Scarpello J H, Segers O, Heller S R, Van Der Veen E A
Department of Medicine, St-Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Diabete Metab. 1992 Jan-Feb;18(1):14-20.
One hundred and ninety patients with symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy took part in a double blind multicentre trial of either placebo or tolrestat 200 mg once daily for 6 months. Painful and paraesthetic symptoms, vibration sensory threshold, and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) were assessed as efficacy end-points during the trial. There was an equally marked improvement of painful symptoms during the trial in the tolrestat and placebo groups. A difference in the improvement of paraesthetic symptoms was found however in favour of the placebo group at 24 weeks (p less than 0.02). The deterioration in mean vibration threshold of the tolrestat group was less than placebo at 24 weeks at all 3 sites measured, and reached significance at the carpal site (p less than 0.05). Significant improvements in median motor NCV and in the mean NCV of the four motor nerves were also seen in tolrestat treated patients at 24 weeks compared to placebo (p less than 0.05). In addition, significant changes in favour of tolrestat were seen when the number of motor nerves per patient with NCV increased during the trial was analysed (p less than 0.001). Concordance analysis of patients with increased mean motor NCV and improvement in painful symptoms demonstrated a positive effect for tolrestat compared to placebo (p less than 0.02). Mild reversible elevations of hepatic transaminases were seen in a few patients treated with tolrestat, with no other significant adverse effects. Tolrestat may therefore be helpful in diabetic peripheral neuropathy, where there is little opportunity for therapeutic intervention apart from effort to achieve normoglycaemic control.
190例有症状的糖尿病性周围神经病患者参与了一项双盲多中心试验,患者被随机分为两组,分别每日服用一次安慰剂或200毫克托瑞司他,为期6个月。在试验期间,将疼痛和感觉异常症状、振动感觉阈值以及神经传导速度(NCV)作为疗效终点进行评估。在试验期间,托瑞司他组和安慰剂组的疼痛症状改善程度相当。然而,在24周时发现感觉异常症状的改善存在差异,安慰剂组更占优势(p<0.02)。在所有测量的3个部位,托瑞司他组在24周时平均振动阈值的恶化程度均小于安慰剂组,在腕部达到显著差异(p<0.05)。与安慰剂相比,在24周时接受托瑞司他治疗的患者正中运动神经传导速度和四条运动神经的平均神经传导速度也有显著改善(p<0.05)。此外,分析试验期间每位患者运动神经数量增加的情况时,发现托瑞司他组有显著变化(p<0.001)。对平均运动神经传导速度增加且疼痛症状改善的患者进行一致性分析,结果显示与安慰剂相比,托瑞司他有积极作用(p<0.02)。少数接受托瑞司他治疗的患者出现了轻度可逆性肝转氨酶升高,未发现其他显著不良反应。因此,在糖尿病性周围神经病中,除了努力实现血糖正常控制外几乎没有治疗干预机会的情况下,托瑞司他可能会有所帮助。