Hansen Wendy F, Ferguson Kristi J, Sipe Christopher S, Sorosky Joel
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;192(2):644-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.595.
This study was undertaken to compare the attitudes of faculty and medical students toward case-based learning and lecture format during the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.
For this prospective comparative study, student presentations were alternately assigned to traditional lecture- or case-based format every 6 weeks. Presentations were made to other students and a single faculty. A total of 31 faculty members, 30 student presenters, and 122 student participants completed evaluations. Teaching methods were compared. RESULTS Faculty members favored lecture format over case-based learning for "attentiveness and interaction of the group" (3.9 vs 4.5, P < .018) and for "meeting the objectives" (3.7 vs 4.5, P < .002). Student participants favored case-based learning in "understanding the relationship between knowledge and clinical practice" (4.34 vs 4.06, P < .05) and "enjoyed" (4.34 vs 3.90, P < .008). Student presenters showed no differences between groups.
Faculty favored lecture format whereas student participants favored a case-based presentation. Student presenters were comfortable with both formats.
本研究旨在比较教师和医学生在妇产科实习期间对基于案例的学习和讲座形式的态度。
在这项前瞻性比较研究中，学生展示每6周交替采用传统讲座或基于案例的形式。展示面向其他学生和一名教师进行。共有31名教师、30名学生展示者和122名学生参与者完成了评估。对教学方法进行了比较。结果 教师在“小组的注意力和互动”方面（3.9对4.5，P < .018）以及“实现目标”方面（3.7对4.5，P < .002）更倾向于讲座形式而非基于案例的学习。学生参与者在“理解知识与临床实践之间的关系”方面（4.34对4.06，P < .05）以及“喜欢程度”方面（4.34对3.90，P < .008）更倾向于基于案例的学习。学生展示者在两组之间没有差异。
教师倾向于讲座形式，而学生参与者倾向于基于案例的展示。学生展示者对两种形式都适应。
