Giuliani Nicole R, Calhoun Vince D, Pearlson Godfrey D, Francis Alan, Buchanan Robert W
Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, Whitehall Building, 200 Retreat Avenue, Hartford, CT 06106, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2005 May 1;74(2-3):135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.08.019.
Many previous studies exploring cortical gray matter (GM) differences in schizophrenia have used "region of interest" (ROI) measurements to manually delineate GM volumes. Recently, some investigators have instead employed voxel-based morphometry (VBM), an automated whole-brain magnetic resonance image measurement technique. The purpose of the current study was to compare the above methods in calculating GM distributions in schizophrenia patients relative to matched controls. Using ROIs, Buchanan et al. (Buchanan, R.W., Francis, A., Arango, C., Miller, K., Lefkowitz, D.M., McMahon, R.P., Barta, P.E. and Pearlson, G.D., 2004. Morphometric assessment of the heteromodal association cortex in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 161 (2), 322-331.) found decreased dorsolateral prefrontal GM volume and altered symmetry of inferior parietal GM in schizophrenia patients. We hypothesized that VBM analyses of the same data would complement the ROI findings. As predicted, VBM analyses replicated results of less left inferior and right superior frontal cortical GM in schizophrenia. Additionally, VBM uncovered a significantly lower concentration of GM in the middle and superior temporal gyri, sought but not detected using ROIs, but did not replicate the parietal changes. The principal explanation for these differences may be the methodological differences between voxel-averaged, landmark-based ROI analyses and the single, voxel-by-voxel whole brain VBM measurements. Although VBM is rapid and fully automated, it is not a replacement for manual ROI-based analyses. Both methods provide different types of information and should thus be used in tandem.
之前许多探索精神分裂症患者皮质灰质(GM)差异的研究,都采用“感兴趣区域”(ROI)测量方法来手动描绘GM体积。最近,一些研究人员转而采用基于体素的形态测量法(VBM),这是一种自动化的全脑磁共振图像测量技术。本研究的目的是比较上述两种方法在计算精神分裂症患者相对于匹配对照组的GM分布情况时的差异。使用ROI方法,布坎南等人(布坎南,R.W.,弗朗西斯,A.,阿朗戈,C.,米勒,K.,莱夫科维茨,D.M.,麦克马洪,R.P.,巴尔塔,P.E.和皮尔森,G.D.,2004年。精神分裂症患者异模态联合皮质的形态测量评估。《美国精神病学杂志》。161(2),322 - 331页)发现精神分裂症患者背外侧前额叶GM体积减小,顶叶下部GM对称性改变。我们假设对相同数据进行VBM分析将补充ROI研究结果。正如预期的那样,VBM分析重复了精神分裂症患者左下额叶和右上额叶皮质GM较少的结果。此外,VBM发现颞中回和颞上回GM浓度显著降低,这是使用ROI方法寻找但未检测到的,但未重复顶叶的变化。这些差异的主要解释可能是基于体素平均、基于地标的ROI分析与单个逐体素全脑VBM测量之间的方法学差异。尽管VBM快速且完全自动化,但它并不能替代基于手动ROI的分析。两种方法提供不同类型的信息,因此应联合使用。