Suppr超能文献

一项比较特级初榨椰子油与矿物油作为轻度至中度皮肤干燥保湿剂的随机双盲对照试验。

A randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing extra virgin coconut oil with mineral oil as a moisturizer for mild to moderate xerosis.

作者信息

Agero Anna Liza C, Verallo-Rowell Vermén M

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Makati Medical Center, Makati City, Philippines.

出版信息

Dermatitis. 2004 Sep;15(3):109-16. doi: 10.2310/6620.2004.04006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Xerosis is a common skin condition (1) characterized by dry, rough, scaly, and itchy skin, (2) associated with a defect in skin barrier function, and (3) treated with moisturizers. People in the tropics have effectively used coconut oil as a traditional moisturizer for centuries. Recently, the oil also has been shown to have skin antiseptic effects. A moisturizer with antiseptic effects has value, but there are no clinical studies to document the efficacy and safety of coconut oil as a skin moisturizer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effectivity and safety of virgin coconut oil compared with mineral oil as a therapeutic moisturizer for mild to moderate xerosis.

METHODS

A randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial was conducted on mild to moderate xerosis in 34 patients with negative patch-test reactions to the test products. These patients were randomized to apply either coconut oil or mineral oil on the legs twice a day for 2 weeks. Quantitative outcome parameters for effectivity were measured at baseline and on each visit with a Corneometer CM825 to measure skin hydration and a Sebumeter SM 810 to measure skin lipids. For safety, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured with a Tewameter TM210, and skin surface hydrogen ion concentration (pH) was measured with a Skin pH Meter PH900. Patients and the investigator separately evaluated, at baseline and at each weekly visit, skin symptoms of dryness, scaling, roughness, and pruritus by using a visual analogue scale and grading of xerosis.

RESULTS

Coconut oil and mineral oil have comparable effects. Both oils showed effectivity through significant improvement in skin hydration and increase in skin surface lipid levels. Safety was demonstrated through no significant difference in TEWL and skin pH. Subjective grading of xerosis by the investigators and visual analogue scales used by the patients showed a general trend toward better (though not statistically evident) improvement with coconut oil than with mineral oil. Safety for both was further demonstrated by negative patch-test results prior to the study and by the absence of adverse reactions during the study.

CONCLUSION

Coconut oil is as effective and safe as mineral oil when used as a moisturizer.

摘要

背景

皮肤干燥症是一种常见的皮肤状况,(1)其特征为皮肤干燥、粗糙、脱屑和瘙痒,(2)与皮肤屏障功能缺陷相关,(3)通常使用保湿剂进行治疗。几个世纪以来,热带地区的人们一直有效地将椰子油用作传统的保湿剂。最近,研究还表明这种油具有皮肤抗菌作用。具有抗菌作用的保湿剂具有一定价值,但尚无临床研究证明椰子油作为皮肤保湿剂的有效性和安全性。

目的

本研究旨在确定初榨椰子油与矿物油相比,作为治疗轻度至中度皮肤干燥症的保湿剂的有效性和安全性。

方法

对34例对测试产品斑贴试验反应阴性的轻度至中度皮肤干燥症患者进行了一项随机双盲对照临床试验。这些患者被随机分为两组,每天两次在腿部涂抹椰子油或矿物油,持续2周。在基线和每次随访时,使用角质层水合测定仪CM825测量皮肤水合作用,使用皮脂测定仪SM 810测量皮肤脂质,以此作为有效性的定量结果参数。为评估安全性,使用透皮水分流失仪TM210测量经表皮水分流失(TEWL),使用皮肤pH计PH900测量皮肤表面氢离子浓度(pH)。患者和研究者在基线和每周随访时,分别使用视觉模拟量表和皮肤干燥症分级来评估皮肤干燥、脱屑、粗糙和瘙痒等症状。

结果

椰子油和矿物油效果相当。两种油都通过显著改善皮肤水合作用和增加皮肤表面脂质水平而显示出有效性。通过TEWL和皮肤pH无显著差异证明了安全性。研究者对皮肤干燥症的主观分级以及患者使用的视觉模拟量表显示,与矿物油相比,椰子油总体上有更好(尽管无统计学意义)的改善趋势。研究前斑贴试验结果为阴性以及研究期间未出现不良反应,进一步证明了两者的安全性。

结论

椰子油用作保湿剂时与矿物油一样有效且安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验