Mehmet Dursun, Meliksah Ertem, Serif Yilmaz, Gunay Saka, Tuncer Ozekinci, Zeynep Simsek
Department of Gastroenterology, Medical School of Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakir, Turkey.
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2005 Feb;58(1):15-9.
Although hepatitis B has been well studied, there are still aspects of its epidemiology that remain to be clarified. There are many regions with high seroprevalence, particularly in the developing regions of the world, and these regions are known to have different epidemiologic patterns. Nonetheless, there are currently no data on the differences in hepatitis B seroprevalence between urban and rural areas of Turkey. In the present study, therefore, we used 30-cluster sampling to determine and compare the prevalence of hepatitis B in the urban and rural areas of the least developed region of Turkey, the southeastern region. From 2,888 adults living in the region, blood samples were obtained from house visits, and screened for HBsAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBcIgG. Factors associated with hepatitis B seroprevalence, particularly living in rural areas, were analyzed with multivariate methods. The seroprevalence of HBsAg was 8.2% in the rural and 6.2% in the urban areas. There was a statistically significant difference between urban and rural regions in terms of HBsAg positivity (crude OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55 - 0.98). Exposure to hepatitis B virus (HBV) increased with age both in urban and rural areas. Lower education level was also an important risk factor for hepatitis B seropositivity in urban areas (adjusted OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.26 - 2.19) but not in rural ones (adjusted OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.36 - 1.69). Familial jaundice history was a statistically significant risk factor for HBsAg positivity in rural areas (adjusted OR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.30 - 3.56) but not in urban ones (adjusted OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.96 - 2.27). This study shows that the prevalence of HBV infection in the southeastern region of Turkey is intermediate among the levels reported for the European region of the World Health Organization.
尽管乙型肝炎已得到充分研究,但其流行病学的某些方面仍有待阐明。世界上有许多地区血清阳性率很高,特别是在发展中地区,而且已知这些地区有不同的流行病学模式。然而,目前尚无关于土耳其城乡地区乙型肝炎血清阳性率差异的数据。因此,在本研究中,我们采用30群组抽样方法来确定和比较土耳其最不发达地区东南部城乡地区的乙型肝炎患病率。从该地区居住的2888名成年人中,通过家访采集血样,并检测乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)、乙肝表面抗体(抗-HBs)和乙肝核心抗体IgG(抗-HBcIgG)。采用多变量方法分析与乙型肝炎血清阳性率相关的因素,特别是居住在农村地区的因素。农村地区HBsAg血清阳性率为8.2%,城市地区为6.2%。城乡地区在HBsAg阳性方面存在统计学显著差异(粗比值比:0.74;95%置信区间:0.55 - 0.98)。城乡地区乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染率均随年龄增长而增加。较低的教育水平也是城市地区乙型肝炎血清阳性的一个重要危险因素(调整后比值比:1.66;95%置信区间:1.26 - 2.19),但在农村地区并非如此(调整后比值比:0.77;95%置信区间:0.36 - 1.69)。家族黄疸病史在农村地区是HBsAg阳性的一个统计学显著危险因素(调整后比值比:2.15;95%置信区间:1.30 - 3.56),但在城市地区并非如此(调整后比值比:1.48;95%置信区间:0.96 - 2.27)。本研究表明,土耳其东南部地区HBV感染率处于世界卫生组织欧洲区域报告的水平之间。