Suppr超能文献

评估骨活检针的样本大小、标本质量及易用性。

Assessment of bone biopsy needles for sample size, specimen quality and ease of use.

作者信息

Roberts C C, Morrison W B, Leslie K O, Carrino J A, Lozevski J L, Liu P T

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 13400 E. Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.

出版信息

Skeletal Radiol. 2005 Jun;34(6):329-35. doi: 10.1007/s00256-004-0859-6. Epub 2005 Mar 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether there are significant differences in ease of use and quality of samples among several bone biopsy needles currently available.

DESIGN

Eight commonly used, commercially available bone biopsy needles of different gauges were evaluated. Each needle was used to obtain five consecutive samples from a lamb lumbar pedicle. Subjective assessment of ease of needle use, ease of sample removal from the needle and sample quality, before and after fixation, was graded on a 5-point scale. The number of attempts necessary to reach a 1 cm depth was recorded. Each biopsy specimen was measured in the gross state and after fixation.

RESULTS

The RADI Bonopty 15 g and Kendall Monoject J-type 11 g needles were rated the easiest to use, while the Parallax Core-Assure 11 g and the Bard Ostycut 16 g were rated the most difficult. Parallax Core-Assure and Kendall Monoject needles had the highest quality specimen in the gross state; Cook Elson/Ackerman 14 g and Bard Ostycut 16 g needles yielded the lowest. The MD Tech without Trap-Lok 11 g needle had the highest quality core after fixation, while the Bard Ostycut 16 g had the lowest. There was a significant difference in pre-fixation sample length between needles (P<0.0001), despite acquiring all cores to a standard 1 cm depth. Core length and width decrease in size by an average of 28% and 42% after fixation.

CONCLUSION

Bone biopsy needles vary significantly in performance. Detailed knowledge of the strengths and weaknesses of different needles is important to make an appropriate selection for each individual's practice.

摘要

目的

评估目前几种可用的骨活检针在易用性和样本质量方面是否存在显著差异。

设计

对八根不同规格、常用的市售骨活检针进行评估。每根针用于从羊腰椎椎弓根连续获取五个样本。在固定前后,对针的易用性、从针中取出样本的难易程度和样本质量进行主观评估,采用5分制评分。记录达到1厘米深度所需的尝试次数。每个活检标本在大体状态和固定后进行测量。

结果

RADI Bonopty 15g和Kendall Monoject J型11g针被评为最易用,而Parallax Core-Assure 11g和Bard Ostycut 16g被评为最难用。Parallax Core-Assure和Kendall Monoject针在大体状态下标本质量最高;Cook Elson/Ackerman 14g和Bard Ostycut 16g针产生的质量最低。无Trap-Lok 11g的MD Tech针在固定后芯质量最高,而Bard Ostycut 16g最低。尽管所有芯都达到标准的1厘米深度,但针之间固定前样本长度存在显著差异(P<0.0001)。固定后芯的长度和宽度平均分别减小28%和42%。

结论

骨活检针的性能差异显著。详细了解不同针的优缺点对于为个人实践做出合适选择很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验