Sarnak Mark J, Katz Ronit, Stehman-Breen Catherine O, Fried Linda F, Jenny Nancy Swords, Psaty Bruce M, Newman Anne B, Siscovick David, Shlipak Michael G
Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr 5;142(7):497-505. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-7-200504050-00008.
Previous studies that evaluated the association of kidney function with incident heart failure may be limited by the insensitivity of serum creatinine concentration for detecting abnormal kidney function.
To compare serum concentrations of cystatin C (a novel marker of kidney function) and creatinine as predictors of incident heart failure.
Observational study based on measurement of serum cystatin C from frozen sera obtained at the 1992-1993 visit of the Cardiovascular Health Study. Follow-up occurred every 6 months.
Adults 65 years of age or older from 4 communities in the United States.
4384 persons without previous heart failure who had measurements of serum cystatin C and serum creatinine.
Incident heart failure.
The mean (+/-SD) serum concentrations of cystatin C and creatinine were 82 +/- 25 nmol/L (1.10 +/- 0.33 mg/L) and 89 +/- 34 micromol/L (1.01 +/- 0.39 mg/dL), respectively. During a median follow-up of 8.3 years (maximum, 9.1 years), 763 (17%) participants developed heart failure. After adjustment for demographic factors, traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular disease status, and medication use, sequential quintiles of cystatin C concentration were associated with a stepwise increased risk for heart failure in Cox proportional hazards models (hazard ratios, 1.0 [reference], 1.30 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.75], 1.44 [CI, 1.07 to 1.94], 1.58 [CI, 1.18 to 2.12], and 2.16 [CI, 1.61 to 2.91]). In contrast, quintiles of serum creatinine concentration were not associated with risk for heart failure in adjusted analysis (hazard ratios, 1.0 [reference], 0.77 [CI, 0.59 to 1.01], 0.85 [CI, 0.64 to 1.13], 0.97 [CI, 0.72 to 1.29], and 1.14 [CI, 0.87 to 1.49]).
The mechanism by which cystatin C concentration predicts risk for heart failure remains unclear.
The cystatin C concentration is an independent risk factor for heart failure in older adults and appears to provide a better measure of risk assessment than the serum creatinine concentration. *For a full list of participating Cardiovascular Health Study investigators and institutions, see http://www.chs-nhlbi.org.
既往评估肾功能与新发心力衰竭关联的研究可能受血清肌酐浓度检测肾功能异常不敏感的限制。
比较胱抑素C(一种新的肾功能标志物)和肌酐的血清浓度作为新发心力衰竭预测指标的情况。
基于1992 - 1993年心血管健康研究访视时采集的冻存血清中胱抑素C测量值的观察性研究。每6个月进行一次随访。
美国4个社区65岁及以上的成年人。
4384名既往无心力衰竭且检测了血清胱抑素C和血清肌酐的人。
新发心力衰竭。
胱抑素C和肌酐的平均(±标准差)血清浓度分别为82±25 nmol/L(1.10±0.33 mg/L)和89±34 μmol/L(1.01±0.39 mg/dL)。在中位随访8.3年(最长9.1年)期间,763名(17%)参与者发生了心力衰竭。在对人口统计学因素、传统和新的心血管危险因素、心血管疾病状态及药物使用进行校正后,在Cox比例风险模型中,胱抑素C浓度的连续五分位数与心力衰竭风险逐步增加相关(风险比,1.0[参照],1.30[95%CI,0.96至1.75],1.44[CI,1.07至1.94],1.58[CI,1.18至2.12],以及2.16[CI,1.61至2.91])。相比之下,校正分析中血清肌酐浓度的五分位数与心力衰竭风险无关(风险比,1.0[参照],0.77[CI,0.59至1.01],0.85[CI,0.64至1.13],0.97[CI,0.72至1.29],以及1.14[CI,0.87至1.49])。
胱抑素C浓度预测心力衰竭风险的机制仍不清楚。
胱抑素C浓度是老年人心力衰竭的独立危险因素,且似乎比血清肌酐浓度能更好地进行风险评估。*有关心血管健康研究所有参与研究者和机构的完整列表,请见http://www.chs - nhlbi.org。