Suppr超能文献

人体空肠对低渗葡萄糖 - 电解质溶液中水和溶质的吸收

Water and solute absorption from hypotonic glucose-electrolyte solutions in human jejunum.

作者信息

Hunt J B, Elliott E J, Fairclough P D, Clark M L, Farthing M J

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London.

出版信息

Gut. 1992 Apr;33(4):479-83. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.4.479.

Abstract

While oral rehydration therapy with glucose-electrolyte solutions is highly effective, the optimal formulation has not yet been defined. Recent clinical studies suggest that stool volume, and thus water losses, may be reduced if glucose is replaced by a polymeric substrate which reduces osmolality. It is possible that the efficacy of glucose monomer based oral rehydration solutions (ORS) will also improve if osmolality is decreased. Using jejunal triple lumen perfusion in healthy adult volunteers net water and solute absorption were studied from three hypotonic solutions with different sodium concentrations (46, 60, 75 mmol/l) but identical glucose concentrations (90 mmol/l), thus allowing osmolality to rise (210, 240, and 270 mOsm/kg, respectively). Results from these solutions (ORS 45:210, ORS 60:240, and ORS 75:270) were compared with the World Health Organisation oral rehydration solution (WHO-ORS). Greatest water absorption was seen with ORS 60:240 (p less than 0.01). Sodium absorption from ORS 60:240 and WHO-ORS was similar and greater than sodium absorption from ORS 45:210 (p less than 0.05). Potassium and glucose absorption were greater from ORS 60:240 than from any of the other hypotonic solutions (p less than 0.05) and were equal to absorption from WHO-ORS). These results in a short segment of healthy human jejunum suggest that hypotonic ORS containing monomeric glucose may increase water absorption.

摘要

虽然使用葡萄糖电解质溶液进行口服补液疗法非常有效,但最佳配方尚未确定。最近的临床研究表明,如果用降低渗透压的聚合物底物替代葡萄糖,粪便量以及由此导致的水分流失可能会减少。如果降低渗透压,基于葡萄糖单体的口服补液溶液(ORS)的疗效也有可能提高。在健康成年志愿者中使用空肠三腔灌注法,研究了来自三种不同钠浓度(46、60、75 mmol/l)但葡萄糖浓度相同(90 mmol/l)的低渗溶液的净水分和溶质吸收情况,从而使渗透压升高(分别为210、240和270 mOsm/kg)。将这些溶液(ORS 45:210、ORS 60:240和ORS 75:270)的结果与世界卫生组织口服补液溶液(WHO-ORS)进行了比较。ORS 60:240的水分吸收最大(p小于0.01)。ORS 60:240和WHO-ORS的钠吸收相似,且大于ORS 45:210的钠吸收(p小于0.05)。ORS 60:240的钾和葡萄糖吸收大于其他任何低渗溶液(p小于0.05),且与WHO-ORS的吸收相等。在健康人空肠的一小段中的这些结果表明,含有单体葡萄糖的低渗ORS可能会增加水分吸收。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Recent Advances of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT).口服补液疗法(ORT)的最新进展
Electrolyte Blood Press. 2010 Dec;8(2):82-6. doi: 10.5049/EBP.2010.8.2.82. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Some differences between duodenal and ileal sorption.十二指肠和回肠吸附之间的一些差异。
Am J Physiol. 1962 Aug;203:215-20. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1962.203.2.215.
7
High sugar worse than high sodium in oral rehydration solutions.口服补液溶液中,高糖比高钠更糟糕。
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1983 Mar;72(2):161-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1983.tb09689.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验