Flynn J M, Deering W, Goldstein M, Rahbar M H
Dyslexia Research Center, Gundersen Clinic, LaCrosse, WI 54601.
J Learn Disabil. 1992 Feb;25(2):133-41. doi: 10.1177/002221949202500207.
The construct validity of Boder's typology of dyslexia was investigated using quantified EEG. Thirty-nine children, ranging in age from 7-0 to 10-11, were recorded during a contextual reading task and at rest. During reading, children with dyslexia were expected to show increased theta and beta amplitude compared to nondisabled readers. These differences were expected in regions of presumed strength for each subtype as a sign of overengagement in task. Children with phonological deficits (dysphonetic dyslexia) were expected to adopt visuospatial processing strategies (right occipital-parietal activation), those with orthographic deficits (dyseidetic dyslexia) to emphasize phonetic strategies (left temporal-parietal activation). Results supported beta frequency differences in anticipated regions by subtype during the reading task. However, the direction of difference hypothesis was not supported. Decreased amplitudes in both groups with dyslexia compared to normally achieving readers suggest reconceptualization of the theoretical base for the Boder subtyping system.
使用定量脑电图研究了博德诵读困难类型学的结构效度。对39名年龄在7岁0个月至10岁11个月之间的儿童在情境阅读任务期间和休息时进行了记录。在阅读过程中,预计诵读困难儿童与非诵读困难读者相比,θ波和β波振幅会增加。预计在每个亚型假定优势区域会出现这些差异,作为任务过度参与的标志。预计有语音缺陷(语音性诵读困难)的儿童会采用视觉空间处理策略(右枕顶叶激活),有正字法缺陷(表象性诵读困难)的儿童会强调语音策略(左颞顶叶激活)。结果支持了阅读任务期间各亚型在预期区域的β频率差异。然而,差异方向假说未得到支持。与正常阅读的读者相比,诵读困难两组的振幅均降低,这表明需要重新构想博德亚型系统的理论基础。