Slijepcevic Predrag, Al-Wahiby Suliman
Brunel Institute of Cancer Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, Division of Biosciences, School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK.
Chromosoma. 2005 Sep;114(4):275-85. doi: 10.1007/s00412-005-0338-4. Epub 2005 Oct 15.
Telomeres play the key protective role at chromosomes. Many studies indicate that loss of telomere function causes activation of DNA damage response. Here, we review evidence supporting interdependence between telomere maintenance and DNA damage response and present a model in which these two pathways are combined into a single mechanism for protecting chromosomal integrity. Proteins directly involved in telomere maintenance and DNA damage response include Ku, DNA-PKcs, RAD51D, PARP-2, WRN and RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 complex. Since most of these proteins participate in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), this was perceived by many authors as a paradox, given that telomeres function to conceal natural DNA ends from mechanisms that detect and repair DSBs. However, we argue here that the key function of one particular DSB protein, Ku, is to prevent or control access of telomerase, the enzyme that synthesises telomeric sequences, to both internal DSBs and natural chromosomal ends. This view is supported by observations that Ku has a high affinity for DNA ends; it acts as a negative regulator of telomerase and that telomerase itself can target internal DSBs. Ku then directs other DSB repair/telomere maintenance proteins to either repair DSBs at internal chromosomal sites or prevent uncontrolled elongation of telomeres by telomerase. This model eliminates the above paradox and provides a testable scenario in which the role of DSB repair proteins is to protect chromosomal integrity by balancing repair activities and telomere maintenance. In our model, a close association between telomeres and different DNA damage response factors is not an unexpected event, but rather a logical result of chromosomal integrity maintenance activities.
端粒在染色体上发挥着关键的保护作用。许多研究表明,端粒功能的丧失会导致DNA损伤反应的激活。在此,我们综述支持端粒维持与DNA损伤反应相互依存关系的证据,并提出一个模型,其中这两条途径被整合为一种保护染色体完整性的单一机制。直接参与端粒维持和DNA损伤反应的蛋白质包括Ku、DNA-PKcs、RAD51D、PARP-2、WRN和RAD50/MRE11/NBS1复合物。由于这些蛋白质中的大多数参与DNA双链断裂(DSB)的修复,许多作者认为这是一个悖论,因为端粒的功能是将天然DNA末端与检测和修复DSB的机制隔离开来。然而,我们在此认为,一种特定的DSB蛋白Ku的关键功能是防止或控制端粒酶(合成端粒序列的酶)接近内部DSB和天然染色体末端。这一观点得到以下观察结果的支持:Ku对DNA末端具有高亲和力;它作为端粒酶的负调节因子,并且端粒酶本身可以靶向内部DSB。然后,Ku引导其他DSB修复/端粒维持蛋白在染色体内部位点修复DSB,或防止端粒酶不受控制地延长端粒。该模型消除了上述悖论,并提供了一个可测试的设想,即DSB修复蛋白的作用是通过平衡修复活动和端粒维持来保护染色体完整性。在我们的模型中,端粒与不同DNA损伤反应因子之间的紧密关联并非意外事件,而是染色体完整性维持活动的逻辑结果。