Armitage Derek
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Lauvier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L3C5.
Environ Manage. 2005 Jun;35(6):703-15. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0076-z.
Why do some community-based natural resource management strategies perform better than others? Commons theorists have approached this question by developing institutional design principles to address collective choice situations, while other analysts have critiqued the underlying assumptions of community-based resource management. However, efforts to enhance community-based natural resource management performance also require an analysis of exogenous and endogenous variables that influence how social actors not only act collectively but do so in ways that respond to changing circumstances, foster learning, and build capacity for management adaptation. Drawing on examples from northern Canada and Southeast Asia, this article examines the relationship among adaptive capacity, community-based resource management performance, and the socio-institutional determinants of collective action, such as technical, financial, and legal constraints, and complex issues of politics, scale, knowledge, community and culture. An emphasis on adaptive capacity responds to a conceptual weakness in community-based natural resource management and highlights an emerging research and policy discourse that builds upon static design principles and the contested concepts in current management practice.
为什么一些基于社区的自然资源管理策略比其他策略表现更好?公地理论家通过制定制度设计原则来解决集体选择问题,从而探讨了这个问题,而其他分析人士则对基于社区的资源管理的潜在假设提出了批评。然而,提高基于社区的自然资源管理绩效的努力还需要分析外部和内部变量,这些变量不仅影响社会行为者如何集体行动,而且影响他们以应对不断变化的情况、促进学习和建立管理适应能力的方式集体行动。本文借鉴加拿大北部和东南亚的例子,研究了适应能力、基于社区的资源管理绩效以及集体行动的社会制度决定因素之间的关系,如技术、金融和法律限制,以及政治、规模、知识、社区和文化等复杂问题。对适应能力的强调回应了基于社区的自然资源管理中的一个概念弱点,并突出了一种新兴的研究和政策话语,这种话语建立在静态设计原则以及当前管理实践中存在争议的概念之上。