Mickel André K, Nguyen Tuan H, Chogle Sami
Department of Endodontics, Case Western Reserve University, School of Dentistry, Cleveland, OH 44106-4905, USA.
J Endod. 2003 Apr;29(4):257-8. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200304000-00006.
Enterococcus faecalis has been shown to be highly resistant once established in the root canal system and may play an important role in endodontic failures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of four root canal sealers on E. faecalis. Seventeen blood-agar plates were inoculated with E. faecalis using the Lawn technique. Five discs were placed on each plate, four with sealers--Sealapex, Roth 811, Kerr EWT, and AH-Plus--and an ampicillin disc as the control. The plates were incubated at 37 degrees C. The zones of inhibition were measured at 24 and 48 h. Analysis using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey test showed a statistically significance difference (p < 0.05) between all four groups of sealers. Roth 811 showed the largest zone of inhibition (1.1 mm), followed by Sealapex (0.8 mm) and Kerr EWT (0.5 mm), whereas AH-Plus had no antimicrobial activity. There was no difference in the zones of inhibition between the 24- and 48-h time periods.
粪肠球菌一旦在根管系统中定植,就已显示出高度耐药性,并且可能在牙髓治疗失败中起重要作用。本研究的目的是评估四种根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。使用涂抹技术将粪肠球菌接种到17个血琼脂平板上。在每个平板上放置5个圆盘,其中4个含有封闭剂——Sealapex、Roth 811、Kerr EWT和AH-Plus——以及一个氨苄青霉素圆盘作为对照。平板在37℃下孵育。在24小时和48小时测量抑菌圈。使用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析,结果显示所有四组封闭剂之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。Roth 811显示出最大的抑菌圈(1.1毫米),其次是Sealapex(0.8毫米)和Kerr EWT(0.5毫米),而AH-Plus没有抗菌活性。在24小时和48小时时间段之间,抑菌圈没有差异。