• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性

Antibacterial activity of a new endodontic sealer against Enterococcus faecalis.

作者信息

Bodrumlu Emre, Semiz Mustafa

机构信息

Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, 55139 Kurupelit-Samsun/Turkey.

出版信息

J Can Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;72(7):637.

PMID:16978482
Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to test a new root canal sealer (Epiphany) and 5 other root canal sealers (Diaket, Endomethasone, AH 26, Sealapex, Sultan) for their antimicrobial effect on Enterococcus faecalis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The antimicrobial effect of 6 root canal sealers was tested by the agar diffusion method. The freshly mixed sealers were placed in prepared wells of agar plates inoculated with E. faecalis. All plates were incubated for 72 hours at 37 degrees C under aerobic conditions, and zones of inhibition were measured at 24, 48 and 72 hours.

RESULTS

All of the sealers caused bacterial growth inhibition. Their effectiveness, in descending order of antimicrobial activity, was as follows: Endomethasone, Sultan, Sealapex, Diaket, Epiphany and AH 26. Epiphany sealer had little effect on the tested microorganism. The effectiveness of the root canal sealers decreased marginally with greater duration of incubation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Epiphany root canal sealer offered no antibacterial advantage over the other sealers tested.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测试一种新型根管封闭剂(Epiphany)以及其他5种根管封闭剂(Diaket、Endomethasone、AH 26、Sealapex、Sultan)对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果。

材料与方法

采用琼脂扩散法测试6种根管封闭剂的抗菌效果。将新鲜混合的封闭剂置于接种了粪肠球菌的琼脂平板的制备孔中。所有平板在37℃有氧条件下孵育72小时,并在24、48和72小时测量抑菌圈。

结果

所有封闭剂均能抑制细菌生长。其有效性按抗菌活性从高到低依次为:Endomethasone、Sultan、Sealapex、Diaket、Epiphany和AH 26。Epiphany封闭剂对受试微生物几乎没有作用。随着孵育时间延长,根管封闭剂的有效性略有下降。

结论

与其他受试封闭剂相比,Epiphany根管封闭剂没有抗菌优势。

相似文献

1
Antibacterial activity of a new endodontic sealer against Enterococcus faecalis.一种新型根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性
J Can Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;72(7):637.
2
A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer.三种根管封闭剂的抗菌效果和流变性比较评价
Int Endod J. 2011 Apr;44(4):307-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01829.x. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
3
Assessment of antibacterial activity of EndoREZ.EndoREZ抗菌活性评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Jul;102(1):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.017. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
4
Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的短期抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2005 Jul;38(7):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x.
5
An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of nine root canal sealers.九种根管封闭剂抗菌活性的体外评价
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Jul 1;9(5):60-7.
6
Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis.通过改良直接接触试验检测根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):1051-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.022.
7
Antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。
J Endod. 2003 Apr;29(4):257-8. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200304000-00006.
8
In vitro pharmacodynamic activities of root canal sealers on Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的体外药效学活性
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 May 1;10(3):35-42.
9
Antibacterial activity of two MTA-based root canal sealers.两种基于 MTA 的根管封闭剂的抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2011 Dec;44(12):1128-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01931.x. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
10
Antibacterial effect of different root canal sealers on three bacterial species.不同根管封闭剂对三种细菌的抗菌效果。
Dent Mater. 2013 May;29(5):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.02.007. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects of Endoseal MTA and AH Plus Sealers on and Mature Biofilms.Endoseal MTA和AH Plus封闭剂对早期和成熟生物膜的体外抗菌作用
Front Dent. 2025 May 19;22:19. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i19.18760. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative in Vitro Study on the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Endodontic Sealers Against Common Oral Pathogens.根管封闭剂对常见口腔病原菌抗菌效果的体外比较研究
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;13(1):17. doi: 10.3390/dj13010017.
3
Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements.
牙髓封闭剂和粘固剂的生物学特性与溶解性
Biomater Investig Dent. 2024 Jun 4;11:40863. doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.40863. eCollection 2024.
4
assessment of antibacterial activity in four endodontic sealers against and using agar diffusion test.采用琼脂扩散试验评估四种根管封闭剂对 和 的抗菌活性。
J Med Life. 2023 Apr;16(4):610-615. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0337.
5
Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of different concentrations of a novel root canal filling material for primary teeth - An study.新型乳牙根管充填材料不同浓度抗菌效果的评估——一项研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:20. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369622. eCollection 2023.
6
The clinical and radiographic success of Endoflas compared with other root canal obturating materials in primary teeth: A systematic review.与其他乳牙根管充填材料相比,Endoflas的临床和影像学成功率:一项系统评价。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2022 Sep 26;19:72. eCollection 2022.
7
Interfacial Biomaterial-Dentin Bacterial Biofilm Proliferation and Viability Is Affected by the Material, Aging Media and Period.界面生物材料-牙本质细菌生物膜的增殖和活力受材料、老化介质和时间的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Feb 24;10(3):33. doi: 10.3390/dj10030033.
8
An in vitro study on the effects of serum proteins on Enterococcus faecalis adhesion to three types of root sealers and gutta-percha.一种血清蛋白对三种根管封闭剂和牙胶黏附粪肠球菌黏附影响的体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 7;21(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01992-4.
9
Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Herbal Extracts Added to Root Canal Sealers of Different Bases: An Study.添加到不同基质根管封闭剂中的草药提取物抗菌效果评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):398-404. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1660.
10
antimicrobial effect of different root canal sealers against oral pathogens.不同根管封闭剂对口腔病原菌的抗菌作用。
Curr Med Mycol. 2017 Jun;3(2):7-12. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.cmm.3.2.7.