• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种根管封闭剂的抗菌性能

Antibacterial properties of four endodontic sealers.

作者信息

Slutzky-Goldberg Iris, Slutzky Hagay, Solomonov Michael, Moshonov Joshua, Weiss Ervin I, Matalon Shlomo

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Endod. 2008 Jun;34(6):735-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.012
PMID:18498902
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of root canal sealers. The direct contact test (DCT) was used to assess the antibacterial properties of AH plus, Apexit Plus, Epiphany SE, and RoekoSeal when in contact with Enterococcus faecalis. The materials were examined immediately after setting and 1, 2, 7, and 14 days after aging in phosphate-buffered-saline. Statistical analysis with two-way analysis of variance, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey multiple comparison was applied to the data. Apexit Plus had a short-term antibacterial effect of 1 day on E. faecalis, whereas Epiphany SE enhanced bacterial growth for at least 7 days. AH plus and RoekoSeal were ineffective.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估根管封闭剂的抗菌效果。采用直接接触试验(DCT)评估AH plus、Apexit Plus、Epiphany SE和RoekoSeal与粪肠球菌接触时的抗菌性能。材料在凝固后以及在磷酸盐缓冲盐水中老化1、2、7和14天后立即进行检测。对数据应用双向方差分析、单向方差分析和Tukey多重比较进行统计分析。Apexit Plus对粪肠球菌有1天的短期抗菌作用,而Epiphany SE至少7天促进细菌生长。AH plus和RoekoSeal无效。

相似文献

1
Antibacterial properties of four endodontic sealers.四种根管封闭剂的抗菌性能
J Endod. 2008 Jun;34(6):735-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
2
Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的短期抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2005 Jul;38(7):483-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x.
3
Antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers on Enterococcus faecalis.根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。
J Endod. 2003 Apr;29(4):257-8. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200304000-00006.
4
A comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy and flow properties for Epiphany, Guttaflow and AH-Plus sealer.三种根管封闭剂的抗菌效果和流变性比较评价
Int Endod J. 2011 Apr;44(4):307-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01829.x. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
5
In vitro antibacterial activities of root-canal sealers by using two different methods.采用两种不同方法对根管封闭剂进行体外抗菌活性研究。
J Endod. 2004 Jan;30(1):57-60. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200401000-00013.
6
In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of three endodontic sealers mixed with amoxicillin.体外评价三种牙胶密封剂混合阿莫西林的抗菌效果。
J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1170-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.033. Epub 2010 May 13.
7
Antimicrobial action of calcium hydroxide-based endodontic sealers after setting, against E. faecalis biofilm.氢氧化钙类根管封闭剂凝固后对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌作用
Braz Oral Res. 2016;30. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0038. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
8
In vitro antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers.根管封闭剂的体外抗菌活性。
J Dent. 2006 Jan;34(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.001.
9
Antibacterial activity of endodontic sealers by modified direct contact test against Enterococcus faecalis.通过改良直接接触试验检测根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。
J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):1051-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.022.
10
In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of nine root canal sealers: direct contact test.九种根管封闭剂抗菌活性的体外评价:直接接触试验
Odontostomatol Trop. 2008 Dec;31(124):11-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Cytotoxicity and Osteogenic Potential of Strontium Silicate and Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers.硅酸锶和硅酸钙基封闭剂的细胞毒性和成骨潜力评估
Int Dent J. 2025 Sep 1;75(6):103869. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.103869.
2
In Vitro Antimicrobial Effects of Endoseal MTA and AH Plus Sealers on and Mature Biofilms.Endoseal MTA和AH Plus封闭剂对早期和成熟生物膜的体外抗菌作用
Front Dent. 2025 May 19;22:19. doi: 10.18502/fid.v22i19.18760. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative study of the pure AH Plus sealer and its combination with triple antibiotic paste at different concentrations on bacteria.
纯AH Plus封闭剂及其与不同浓度三联抗生素糊剂联合应用对细菌的比较研究
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2024 Jul 12;21:32. eCollection 2024.
4
Is a Pre-Existent Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Able to Detect Metal Dental Posts?术前锥形束计算机断层扫描能否检测出金属牙桩?
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;12(7):229. doi: 10.3390/dj12070229.
5
Influence of sealer type on treatment outcome of teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review.不同根管封闭剂对根尖周炎治疗效果的影响:系统评价。
Braz Dent J. 2023 Sep-Oct;34(5):1-21. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305471.
6
Evaluation of the Antibacterial Activity of EndoSeal MTA, iRoot SP, and AH Plus against Planktonic Bacteria.EndoSeal MTA、iRoot SP和AH Plus对浮游细菌的抗菌活性评估。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;15(6):2012. doi: 10.3390/ma15062012.
7
Impacts of Resveratrol and Pyrogallol on Physicochemical, Mechanical and Biological Properties of Epoxy-Resin Sealers.白藜芦醇和连苯三酚对环氧树脂封闭剂物理化学、机械及生物学性能的影响
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Feb 22;9(3):85. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9030085.
8
The Short-Term Antibacterial Activity of Three Selected Endodontic Sealers against Bacterial Culture.三种选定的根管封闭剂对细菌培养物的短期抗菌活性
Life (Basel). 2022 Jan 21;12(2):158. doi: 10.3390/life12020158.
9
Adding Two Antimicrobial Glasses to an Endodontic Sealer to Prevent Bacterial Root Canal Reinfection: An In Vivo Pilot Study in Dogs.在根管封闭剂中添加两种抗菌玻璃以预防细菌根管再感染:犬体内的一项初步研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 28;10(10):1183. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101183.
10
Incorporating Antimicrobial Nanomaterial and its Effect on the Antimicrobial Activity, Flow and Radiopacity of Endodontic Sealers.抗菌纳米材料的纳入及其对根管封闭剂抗菌活性、流动性和射线不透过性的影响。
Eur Endod J. 2017 Jul 6;2(1):1-6. doi: 10.14744/eej.2017.16029. eCollection 2017.