Mas Jean-François
Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, Unidad Foránea Morelia, Aquiles Serdán, 382, Colonia Centro, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico.
Environ Monit Assess. 2005 Jun;105(1-3):69-80. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-3156-5.
Many studies are based on the assumption that an area and its surrounding (buffer) area present similar environmental conditions and can be compared. For example, in order to assess the effectiveness of a protected area, the land use/cover changes are compared inside the park with its surroundings. However, the heterogeneity in spatial variables can bias this assessment: we have shown that most of the protected areas in Mexico present significant environmental differences between their interior and their surroundings. Therefore, a comparison that aims at assessing the effectiveness of conservation strategies, must be cautioned. In this paper, a simple method which allows the generation of a buffer area that presents similar conditions with respect to a set of environmental variables is presented. The method was used in order to assess the effectiveness of the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, a protected area located in the south-eastern part of Mexico. The annual rate of deforestation inside the protected area, the standard buffer area (based upon distance from the protected area only) and the similar buffer area (taking into account distance along with some environmental variables) were 0.3, 1.3 and 0.6%, respectively. These results showed that the protected area was effective in preventing land clearing, but that the comparison with the standard buffer area gave an over-optimistic vision of its effectiveness.
许多研究基于这样一种假设,即一个区域及其周边(缓冲)区域呈现相似的环境条件且可进行比较。例如,为评估一个保护区的有效性,会将公园内部及其周边的土地利用/覆盖变化进行比较。然而,空间变量的异质性可能会使这种评估产生偏差:我们已表明,墨西哥的大多数保护区在其内部和周边之间存在显著的环境差异。因此,旨在评估保护策略有效性的比较必须谨慎。本文提出了一种简单方法,该方法可生成一个在一组环境变量方面呈现相似条件的缓冲区。该方法用于评估位于墨西哥东南部的一个保护区——卡拉科姆尔生物圈保护区的有效性。保护区内的年森林砍伐率、标准缓冲区(仅基于与保护区的距离)和相似缓冲区(同时考虑距离以及一些环境变量)分别为0.3%、1.3%和0.6%。这些结果表明,该保护区在防止土地开垦方面是有效的,但与标准缓冲区的比较对其有效性给出了过于乐观的看法。