• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教老年人使用互联网获取医疗保健信息:前后对照研究。

Teaching elderly adults to use the Internet to access health care information: before-after study.

作者信息

Campbell Robert J, Nolfi David A

机构信息

Rangos School of Health Sciences, Department of Health Management Systems, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jun 30;7(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e19.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.7.2.e19
PMID:15998610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1550650/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Much has been written about the Internet's potential to revolutionize health care delivery. As younger populations increasingly utilize Internet-based health care information, it will be essential to ensure that the elderly become adept at using this medium for health care purposes, especially those from minority, low income, and limited educational backgrounds.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents the results of a program designed to teach elderly adults to use the Internet to access health care information. The objective was to examine whether the training led to changes in participant's perceptions of their health, perceptions of their interactions with health care providers, health information-seeking behaviors, and self-care activities.

METHODS

Participants attended a 5-week training course held in public libraries and senior community centers within the greater Pittsburgh and Allegheny County region. Classes within each seminar lasted 2 hours and consisted of lecture and hands-on training. Baseline surveys were administered prior to the course, 5-week follow-up surveys were administered immediately after the course, and final surveys were mailed 1 year later. Instruments included the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scale, which measures three domains of locus of control (internal, external, and chance); the Krantz Health Opinion Survey (HOS); and the Lau, Hartman, and Ware Health Value Survey. Two additional questionnaires included multiple choice and qualitative questions designed to measure participants' Internet utilization and levels of health care participation. The Health Participation Survey was administered with the baseline survey. The Internet Use Survey was administered at the 1-year mark and contained several items from the Health Participation Survey, which allowed comparison between baseline and 1-year responses.

RESULTS

Of the60 elderly adults who began the training course, 42 (mean age 72) completed the entire 5-week training program and the 5-week follow-up questionnaire administered immediately after the program, and 27 completed the 1-year follow-up survey. Statistically significant differences were found between baseline and 5-week follow-up results for MHLC chance subscores in males (P = .02) and females (P = .05), as well as total HOS information seeking scores (P = .05). However, these statistically significant findings disappeared when all 60 original participants were included using a "last observation carried forward" imputation. No statistically significant changes were found between baseline and 5-week follow-up surveys for MHLC external (P = .44) and internal (P = .97) locus of control scores in both genders, or for the HOS behavioral involvement subscale (P = .65).

CONCLUSIONS

We failed to show robust before-after effects for most of the outcomes measured. Elderly adults may be willing to use the Internet as a source for general health information; however, when making decisions about their health care, our participants seemed to adhere to a physician-centered model of care. Demographic and situational variables may play a large role in determining which seniors will use the Internet for making behavioral decisions about their health care and in which scenarios they will do so.

摘要

背景

关于互联网变革医疗服务的潜力,已有诸多论述。随着年轻人群越来越多地利用基于互联网的医疗信息,确保老年人,尤其是来自少数族裔、低收入和教育程度有限背景的老年人,能够熟练运用这一媒介实现医疗目的,将至关重要。

目的

本文介绍了一项旨在教导老年人使用互联网获取医疗信息的项目成果。目的是检验该培训是否会导致参与者对自身健康的认知、对与医疗服务提供者互动的认知、健康信息寻求行为以及自我护理活动发生变化。

方法

参与者参加了在匹兹堡和阿勒格尼县大区的公共图书馆和老年社区中心举办的为期5周的培训课程。每个研讨班的课程时长为2小时,包括讲座和实践培训。在课程开始前进行基线调查,课程结束后立即进行5周随访调查,1年后邮寄最终调查问卷。所使用的工具包括多维健康控制点(MHLC)量表,该量表测量控制点的三个维度(内控、外控和机遇);克兰茨健康意见调查(HOS);以及刘、哈特曼和韦尔健康价值调查。另外两份问卷包括多项选择题和定性问题,旨在测量参与者的互联网使用情况和医疗参与水平。健康参与调查与基线调查同时进行。互联网使用调查在1年时进行,包含了健康参与调查中的几个项目,以便比较基线和1年时的回答。

结果

在开始培训课程的60名老年人中,42人(平均年龄72岁)完成了整个5周的培训项目以及项目结束后立即进行的5周随访问卷,27人完成了1年随访调查。在男性(P = 0.02)和女性(P = 0.05)的MHLC机遇子分数以及总HOS信息寻求分数(P = 0.05)方面,基线和5周随访结果之间发现了统计学上的显著差异。然而,当使用“末次观察结转”插补法将所有60名原始参与者纳入分析时,这些统计学上的显著发现消失了。在两性的MHLC外控(P = 0.44)和内控(P = 0.97)控制点分数方面,以及HOS行为参与子量表(P = 0.65)方面,基线和5周随访调查之间未发现统计学上的显著变化。

结论

对于所测量的大多数结果,我们未能显示出明显的前后效应。老年人可能愿意将互联网作为一般健康信息的来源;然而,在做出关于自身医疗保健的决策时,我们的参与者似乎坚持以医生为中心的护理模式。人口统计学和情境变量可能在决定哪些老年人会使用互联网做出关于其医疗保健的行为决策以及在哪些情况下会这样做方面发挥很大作用。

相似文献

1
Teaching elderly adults to use the Internet to access health care information: before-after study.教老年人使用互联网获取医疗保健信息:前后对照研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Jun 30;7(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e19.
2
Effectiveness of CancerGuides a study of an integrative cancer care training program for health professionals.《癌症指南的有效性》——一项针对卫生专业人员的综合癌症护理培训项目研究
Integr Cancer Ther. 2007 Mar;6(1):14-24. doi: 10.1177/1534735406298145.
3
The Brookline Early Education Project: a 25-year follow-up study of a family-centered early health and development intervention.布鲁克莱恩早期教育项目:一项以家庭为中心的早期健康与发展干预措施的25年随访研究。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jul;116(1):144-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2515.
4
A survey of patient satisfaction and use of the Internet for health information.一项关于患者满意度及利用互联网获取健康信息的调查。
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Mar;61(3):458-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01094.x.
5
Nationwide satellite training for public health professionals: Web-based follow-up.面向公共卫生专业人员的全国性卫星培训:基于网络的后续跟进。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007 Spring;27(2):111-7. doi: 10.1002/chp.109.
6
Do older adults use the Internet for information on heart attacks? Results from a survey of seniors in King County, Washington.老年人会利用互联网获取有关心脏病发作的信息吗?华盛顿州金县老年人调查结果。
Heart Lung. 2005 Jan-Feb;34(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.06.006.
7
The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions.互联网上的健康信息对医患关系的影响:患者认知
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1727-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1727.
8
Simulation-based crisis team training for multidisciplinary obstetric providers.针对多学科产科医护人员的基于模拟的危机团队培训。
Simul Healthc. 2009 Summer;4(2):77-83. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31819171cd.
9
Incidental health information use and media complementarity: a comparison of senior and non-senior cancer patients.偶然的健康信息使用与媒体互补性:老年与非老年癌症患者的比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jun;71(3):340-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
10
Efficacy of an outdoor air pollution education program in a community at risk for asthma morbidity.一项针对有哮喘发病风险社区的室外空气污染教育项目的成效
J Asthma. 2008 Nov;45(9):839-44. doi: 10.1080/02770900802339759.

引用本文的文献

1
How does digital literacy affect the health status of senior citizens? Micro-level evidence from the CFPS data.数字素养如何影响老年人的健康状况?来自中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)数据的微观层面证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12314-7.
2
Association Between Intergenerational Support, Technology Perception and Trust, and Intention to Seek Medical Care on the Internet Among Chinese Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.中国老年人代际支持、技术认知与信任以及互联网就医意愿之间的关联:横断面问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 6;27:e65065. doi: 10.2196/65065.
3
Older adults' self-perception, technology anxiety, and intention to use digital public services.老年人的自我认知、技术焦虑以及使用数字公共服务的意愿。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):3533. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21088-2.
4
The impact of short video usage on the mental health of elderly people.短视频使用对老年人心理健康的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 31;12(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02125-6.
5
Health Locus of Control and Medical Behavioral Interventions: Systematic Review and Recommendations.健康控制点与医学行为干预:系统评价与建议
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Oct 10;13:e52287. doi: 10.2196/52287.
6
Digital Literacy Training for Low-Income Older Adults Through Undergraduate Community-Engaged Learning: Single-Group Pretest-Posttest Study.通过本科社区参与式学习为低收入老年人提供数字扫盲培训:单组前后测试研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 May 14;7:e51675. doi: 10.2196/51675.
7
Training to use smart tablets to access reliable online health information in older adults' post-pandemic: A focused pilot intervention study.疫情后老年人使用智能平板电脑获取可靠在线健康信息的培训:一项重点试点干预研究。
Geriatr Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;56:204-211. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
8
Blockchain-enabled cross-chain collaboration model for elderly health information from a whole process perspective.基于区块链的全流程老年人健康信息跨链协作模型。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;11:1081539. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1081539. eCollection 2023.
9
Online Health Information Seeking Behaviors Among Older Adults: Systematic Scoping Review.老年人在线健康信息搜索行为:系统范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 16;24(2):e34790. doi: 10.2196/34790.
10
E-health literacy in older adults: an evolutionary concept analysis.老年人的电子健康素养:一个进化的概念分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jan 31;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01761-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites.治疗黑人和白人的初级保健医生。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 5;351(6):575-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa040609.
2
To close gaps in care, more health plans ask about race.为了缩小医疗差距,越来越多的健康保险计划开始询问种族信息。
Wall St J (East Ed). 2004 Jun 1:B1, B5.
3
Older women and the internet.老年女性与互联网。
J Women Aging. 2004;16(1-2):161-74. doi: 10.1300/J074v16n01_11.
4
The quality of medical care provided to vulnerable community-dwelling older patients.为社区居住的弱势老年患者提供的医疗服务质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 4;139(9):740-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-9-200311040-00008.
5
Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey.利用互联网和电子邮件获取医疗保健信息:一项全国性调查的结果。
JAMA. 2003 May 14;289(18):2400-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.18.2400.
6
Seniors connect: a partnership for training between health care and public libraries.老年人互联:医疗保健与公共图书馆之间的培训合作关系。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2002 Fall;21(3):1-19. doi: 10.1300/J115v21n03_01.
7
Medical expenditures for major diseases, 1995.1995年重大疾病的医疗支出。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1999 Winter;21(2):119-64.
8
Patient participation in decision making about care.患者参与医疗护理决策。
Cancer Nurs. 2001 Jun;24(3):172-9. doi: 10.1097/00002820-200106000-00002.
9
Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?患者对医疗决策的偏好:究竟谁真正想要参与?
Med Care. 2000 Mar;38(3):335-41. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00010.
10
Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions.临床医学中的共同决策:既往研究与未来方向。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Nov;17(4):285-94. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00097-5.