Marshall J G
Faculty of Library and Information Science, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Apr;80(2):169-78.
In these times of economic constraint, libraries of all types are under increasing pressure to evaluate their services. Hospital libraries face a particular challenge because the goals of the health care system demand that the relevance of library services to patient care be determined. The hospital librarians in Rochester, New York, responded to this challenge by developing a research project that explored the impact of library services on clinical decision making. A systematically sampled group of 448 physicians in the Rochester area agreed to participate in the study between September 1990 and March 1991. The physicians were asked to request some information related to a current clinical case and then to evaluate its impact on the care of their patients. Senior medical staff or administrators acted as study facilitators in each of the fifteen participating hospitals. As a result of the information provided by the library, 80% of the 208 physicians who returned their questionnaires said that they probably or definitely handled some aspect of patient care differently than they would have handled it otherwise. Changes in the following specific aspects of care were reported by the physicians: diagnosis (29%), choice of tests (51%), choice of drugs (45%), reduced length of hospital stay (19%), and advice given to the patient (72%). Physicians also said that the information provided by the library contributed to their ability to avoid the following: hospital admission (12%), patient mortality (19%), hospital-acquired infection (8%), surgery (21%), and additional tests or procedures (49%). The physicians rated the information provided by the library more highly than that provided by other information sources such as diagnostic imaging, lab tests, and discussions with colleagues. In addition to confirming earlier research findings that information provided by hospital libraries is perceived by physicians as having a significant impact on clinical decision making, the results increase our store of scientific knowledge about the specific nature and extent of the impact of information provided by the hospital library.
在当前经济紧缩时期,各类图书馆面临着越来越大的评估服务压力。医院图书馆面临着特殊的挑战,因为医疗保健系统的目标要求确定图书馆服务与患者护理的相关性。纽约罗切斯特的医院图书馆员通过开展一项研究项目来应对这一挑战,该项目探讨了图书馆服务对临床决策的影响。1990年9月至1991年3月期间,从罗切斯特地区系统抽样的448名医生同意参与该研究。这些医生被要求索取一些与当前临床病例相关的信息,然后评估其对患者护理的影响。在15家参与研究的医院中,高级医务人员或管理人员担任研究协调员。在返回问卷的208名医生中,80%表示,由于图书馆提供的信息,他们在患者护理的某些方面的处理方式可能或肯定与没有这些信息时不同。医生们报告了护理在以下具体方面的变化:诊断(29%)、检查选择(51%)、药物选择(45%)、住院时间缩短(19%)以及给患者的建议(72%)。医生们还表示,图书馆提供的信息有助于他们避免以下情况:住院(12%)、患者死亡(19%)、医院获得性感染(8%)、手术(21%)以及额外的检查或程序(49%)。医生们对图书馆提供的信息评价高于其他信息来源,如诊断成像、实验室检查以及与同事的讨论。除了证实早期研究结果,即医生认为医院图书馆提供的信息对临床决策有重大影响外,这些结果还增加了我们对医院图书馆提供信息的具体性质和影响程度的科学认识。