Berghs M, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Gastmans C
Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug;31(8):441-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009092.
In this literature review, a picture is given of the complexity of nursing attitudes toward euthanasia. The myriad of data found in empirical literature is mostly framed within a polarised debate and inconclusive about the complex reality behind attitudes toward euthanasia. Yet, a further examination of the content as well as the context of attitudes is more revealing. The arguments for euthanasia have to do with quality of life and respect for autonomy. Arguments against euthanasia have to do with non-maleficence, sanctity of life, and the notion of the slippery slope. When the context of attitudes is examined a number of positive correlates for euthanasia such as age, nursing specialty, and religion appear. In a further analysis of nurses' comments on euthanasia, it is revealed that part of the complexity of nursing attitudes toward euthanasia arises because of the needs of nurses at the levels of clinical practice, communication, emotions, decision making, and ethics.
在这篇文献综述中,展现了护理人员对安乐死态度的复杂性。实证文献中发现的大量数据大多围绕一场两极分化的辩论展开,对于安乐死态度背后的复杂现实尚无定论。然而,对态度的内容和背景进行进一步审视会更具启发性。支持安乐死的论据与生活质量和尊重自主权有关。反对安乐死的论据与不伤害原则、生命的神圣性以及滑坡概念有关。当审视态度的背景时,出现了一些与安乐死呈正相关的因素,如年龄、护理专业和宗教。在对护士关于安乐死评论的进一步分析中发现,护理人员对安乐死态度的部分复杂性源于临床实践、沟通、情感、决策和伦理层面护士的需求。