• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

事件发生时间标志物的敏感性和特异性。

The sensitivity and specificity of markers for event times.

作者信息

Cai Tianxi, Pepe Margaret Sullivan, Zheng Yingye, Lumley Thomas, Jenny Nancy Swords

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Biostatistics. 2006 Apr;7(2):182-97. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxi047. Epub 2005 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/kxi047
PMID:16079162
Abstract

The statistical literature on assessing the accuracy of risk factors or disease markers as diagnostic tests deals almost exclusively with settings where the test, Y, is measured concurrently with disease status D. In practice, however, disease status may vary over time and there is often a time lag between when the marker is measured and the occurrence of disease. One example concerns the Framingham risk score (FR-score) as a marker for the future risk of cardiovascular events, events that occur after the score is ascertained. To evaluate such a marker, one needs to take the time lag into account since the predictive accuracy may be higher when the marker is measured closer to the time of disease occurrence. We therefore consider inference for sensitivity and specificity functions that are defined as functions of time. Semiparametric regression models are proposed. Data from a cohort study are used to estimate model parameters. One issue that arises in practice is that event times may be censored. In this research, we extend in several respects the work by Leisenring et al. (1997) that dealt only with parametric models for binary tests and uncensored data. We propose semiparametric models that accommodate continuous tests and censoring. Asymptotic distribution theory for parameter estimates is developed and procedures for making statistical inference are evaluated with simulation studies. We illustrate our methods with data from the Cardiovascular Health Study, relating the FR-score measured at enrollment to subsequent risk of cardiovascular events.

摘要

关于评估作为诊断测试的风险因素或疾病标志物准确性的统计文献几乎完全涉及测试变量Y与疾病状态D同时测量的情况。然而,在实际中,疾病状态可能随时间变化,并且在测量标志物与疾病发生之间通常存在时间滞后。一个例子是弗雷明汉风险评分(FR评分)作为心血管事件未来风险的标志物,这些事件在确定评分之后发生。为了评估这样一个标志物,需要考虑时间滞后,因为当标志物在更接近疾病发生时间测量时,预测准确性可能更高。因此,我们考虑对定义为时间函数的灵敏度和特异性函数进行推断。提出了半参数回归模型。使用队列研究的数据来估计模型参数。实际中出现的一个问题是事件时间可能被截尾。在本研究中,我们在几个方面扩展了Leisenring等人(1997年)的工作,他们的工作仅涉及二元测试的参数模型和未截尾数据。我们提出了适用于连续测试和截尾的半参数模型。发展了参数估计的渐近分布理论,并通过模拟研究评估了进行统计推断的程序。我们用心血管健康研究的数据说明了我们的方法,将入组时测量的FR评分与随后的心血管事件风险联系起来。

相似文献

1
The sensitivity and specificity of markers for event times.事件发生时间标志物的敏感性和特异性。
Biostatistics. 2006 Apr;7(2):182-97. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxi047. Epub 2005 Aug 3.
2
Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.用于对删失事件时间进行分类的多种诊断测试的稳健组合。
Biostatistics. 2008 Apr;9(2):216-33. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm037. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
3
Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.纵向标记数据的时间依赖性ROC曲线的半参数估计。
Biostatistics. 2004 Oct;5(4):615-32. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh013.
4
Prospective accuracy for longitudinal markers.纵向标记物的前瞻性准确性。
Biometrics. 2007 Jun;63(2):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00726.x.
5
Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.生存模型预测准确性和ROC曲线。
Biometrics. 2005 Mar;61(1):92-105. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2005.030814.x.
6
Regression analysis of panel count data with dependent observation times.具有相依观测时间的面板计数数据的回归分析。
Biometrics. 2007 Dec;63(4):1053-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00808.x.
7
A model free approach to combining biomarkers.一种用于组合生物标志物的无模型方法。
Biom J. 2008 Aug;50(4):558-70. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710428.
8
Semiparametric regression analysis for recurrent event interval counts.复发事件间隔计数的半参数回归分析
Biometrics. 1997 Dec;53(4):1334-53.
9
Attributable risk function in the proportional hazards model for censored time-to-event.删失生存时间的比例风险模型中的归因风险函数。
Biostatistics. 2006 Oct;7(4):515-29. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj023. Epub 2006 Feb 14.
10
Semiparametric inference for surrogate endpoints with bivariate censored data.具有双变量删失数据的替代终点的半参数推断
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):149-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00834.x. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing subject heterogeneity in time-dependent discrimination for biomarker evaluation.针对生物标志物评估中的时依性判别中的受试个体异质性问题。
Stat Med. 2024 Mar 30;43(7):1341-1353. doi: 10.1002/sim.10024. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
2
Statistical assessment of the prognostic and the predictive value of biomarkers-A biomarker assessment framework with applications to traumatic brain injury biomarker studies.生物标志物预后和预测价值的统计学评估——一个应用于创伤性脑损伤生物标志物研究的生物标志物评估框架。
Res Methods Med Health Sci. 2023 Jan;4(1):34-48. doi: 10.1177/26320843221141056. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Concordance Measures and Time-Dependent ROC Methods.
一致性测量与时变ROC方法。
Biostat Epidemiol. 2021;5(2):232-249. doi: 10.1080/24709360.2021.1926189. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
Add-on individualizing prediction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using deep-learning based on MRI: A multicentre, validation study.基于MRI的深度学习辅助个性化预测鼻咽癌:一项多中心验证研究。
iScience. 2022 Aug 3;25(9):104841. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104841. eCollection 2022 Sep 16.
5
Prognostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in predicting risk of ICU admission for COVID-19: application of time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves.炎症标志物预测 COVID-19 患者 ICU 收治风险的预后准确性:时间依赖性受试者工作特征曲线的应用。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Jun;50(6):3000605221102217. doi: 10.1177/03000605221102217.
6
Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data.利用癌症基因组图谱数据评估多形性胶质母细胞瘤生物标志物的预后准确性
Cancer Inform. 2017 Dec 13;16:1176935117734844. doi: 10.1177/1176935117734844. eCollection 2017.
7
Estimation and inference of predictive discrimination for survival outcome risk prediction models.生存结局风险预测模型的预测判别估计与推断。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2022 Apr;28(2):219-240. doi: 10.1007/s10985-022-09545-9. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
8
Fitting and Cross-Validating Cox Models to Censored Big Data With Missing Values Using Extensions of Partial Least Squares Regression Models.使用偏最小二乘回归模型的扩展方法对带有缺失值的删失大数据进行Cox模型拟合和交叉验证
Front Big Data. 2021 Nov 1;4:684794. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.684794. eCollection 2021.
9
Prognostication of patients with COVID-19 using artificial intelligence based on chest x-rays and clinical data: a retrospective study.基于胸部 X 光片和临床数据的人工智能预测 COVID-19 患者的预后:一项回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 May;3(5):e286-e294. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00039-X. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Performance of Gene Expression Profile Tests for Prognosis in Patients With Localized Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.用于局部皮肤黑色素瘤患者预后的基因表达谱检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Sep 1;156(9):953-962. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1731.