Krøigaard M, Garvey L H, Menné T, Husum B
Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre, Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen.
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Oct;95(4):468-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei198. Epub 2005 Aug 12.
The aim of this retrospective survey of possible allergic reactions during anaesthesia was to investigate whether the cause suspected by anaesthetists involved corresponded with the cause found on subsequent investigation in the Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre (DAAC).
Case notes and anaesthetic charts from 111 reactions in 107 patients investigated in the DAAC were scrutinized for either suspicions of or warnings against specific substances stated to be the cause of the supposed allergic reaction.
In 67 cases, one or more substances were suspected. In 49 of these (73%) the suspected cause did not match the results of subsequent investigation, either a different substance being the cause or no cause being found. Only five cases (7%) showed a complete match between suspected cause and investigation result. In the remaining 13 cases (19%) there was a partial match, the right substance being suspected, but investigations showed an additional allergen or several substances, including the right substance being suspected.
An informed guess is not a reliable way of determining the cause of a supposed allergic reaction during anaesthesia and may put a significant number of patients at unnecessary risk. Some patients may be labelled with a wrong allergy, leading to unnecessary warnings against harmless substances, and some patients may be put at risk of subsequent re-exposure to the real allergen. Patients with suspected allergic reactions during anaesthesia should be referred for investigation in specialist centres whenever possible.
本次对麻醉期间可能发生的过敏反应进行的回顾性调查,旨在研究麻醉医生怀疑的病因是否与丹麦麻醉过敏中心(DAAC)后续调查发现的病因相符。
仔细查阅了DAAC对107例患者的111次反应的病例记录和麻醉图表,以查找对据称是过敏反应病因的特定物质的怀疑或警示。
67例中怀疑了一种或多种物质。其中49例(73%)怀疑的病因与后续调查结果不符,要么是不同物质为病因,要么未找到病因。仅5例(7%)怀疑的病因与调查结果完全匹配。其余13例(19%)为部分匹配,怀疑的物质正确,但调查显示还有其他过敏原或几种物质,包括怀疑的正确物质。
凭经验猜测并非确定麻醉期间疑似过敏反应病因的可靠方法,可能会使大量患者面临不必要的风险。一些患者可能被错误地贴上过敏标签,导致对无害物质进行不必要的警示,而一些患者可能面临随后再次接触真正过敏原的风险。麻醉期间疑似过敏反应的患者应尽可能转诊至专科中心进行调查。