Pomplun Mark, Custer Michael
Assessment. 2005 Sep;12(3):338-46. doi: 10.1177/1073191105276796.
This study examines the validity of the measures of verbal and nonverbal working memory on the Stanford-Binet Fifth Edition (SB5). The validity evidence included Rasch-based, criterion-referenced item mapping, correlations with other clinical measures of memory, and prediction of reading and mathematics scores. The item mapping clearly demonstrates a parallel between increasing item difficulty and a progression of item characteristics that placed increasing demands on verbal and nonverbal working memory. The higher correlations of the SB5 verbal and nonverbal working memory subtests with other measures of verbal and nonverbal memory, respectively, and lower correlations with nonverbal and verbal memory measures, respectively, clearly show convergent and divergent validity. The higher correlations between SB5 verbal working memory and reading skills and between SB5 nonverbal memory and mathematics skills are consistent with past research.
本研究考察了斯坦福-比奈智力量表第五版（SB5）中言语和非言语工作记忆测量的有效性。有效性证据包括基于拉施模型的、标准参照的项目映射、与其他记忆临床测量的相关性以及对阅读和数学成绩的预测。项目映射清楚地表明，随着项目难度的增加，项目特征也在不断发展，对言语和非言语工作记忆的要求也越来越高。SB5言语和非言语工作记忆子测验分别与其他言语和非言语记忆测量的较高相关性，以及分别与非言语和言语记忆测量的较低相关性，清楚地显示了聚合效度和区分效度。SB5言语工作记忆与阅读技能之间以及SB5非言语记忆与数学技能之间的较高相关性与以往的研究一致。
