• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采集协议和处理流程对T1加权磁共振图像组织分割的影响。

Impact of acquisition protocols and processing streams on tissue segmentation of T1 weighted MR images.

作者信息

Clark Kristi A, Woods Roger P, Rottenberg David A, Toga Arthur W, Mazziotta John C

机构信息

Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, 660 Charles E. Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.035. Epub 2005 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.035
PMID:16139526
Abstract

The segmentation of T1-weighted images into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a fundamental processing step in neuroimaging, the results of which affect many other structural imaging analyses. Variability in the segmentation process can decrease the power of a study to detect anatomical differences, and minimizing such variability can lead to more robust results. This paper outlines a straightforward strategy that can be used (1) to select more optimal data acquisition and processing protocols and (2) to quantify the impact of such optimization. Using this approach with multiple scans of a single subject, we found that the choice of a segmentation algorithm had the largest impact on variability, while the choice of a pulse sequence had the second largest impact. The data indicate that the classification of GM is the most variable, and that the optimal protocol may differ across tissue types. Therefore, the intended use of segmentation data should play a role in optimization. Examples are provided to demonstrate that the minimization of variability is not sufficient for optimization; the overall accuracy of the approach must also be considered. Simple volumetric computations are included to illustrate the potential gain of optimization; these results show that volume estimates from optimal pathways were on average three times less variable than estimates from suboptimal pathways. Therefore, the simple strategy illustrated here can be applied to many studies to optimize tissue segmentation, which should lead to a net increase in the power of structural neuroimaging studies.

摘要

将T1加权图像分割为灰质(GM)、白质(WM)和脑脊液(CSF)是神经影像学中的一个基本处理步骤,其结果会影响许多其他结构成像分析。分割过程中的变异性会降低研究检测解剖差异的能力,而将这种变异性降至最低可带来更可靠的结果。本文概述了一种简单的策略,可用于(1)选择更优的数据采集和处理方案,以及(2)量化这种优化的影响。对同一受试者进行多次扫描并使用这种方法,我们发现分割算法的选择对变异性影响最大,而脉冲序列的选择影响次之。数据表明,灰质的分类变异性最大,并且最优方案可能因组织类型而异。因此,分割数据的预期用途应在优化中发挥作用。文中提供了示例以证明变异性最小化不足以实现优化;还必须考虑该方法的整体准确性。文中包含简单的体积计算以说明优化的潜在收益;这些结果表明,来自最优路径的体积估计值的变异性平均比来自次优路径的估计值小三倍。因此,这里阐述的简单策略可应用于许多研究以优化组织分割,这将使结构神经影像学研究的效能得到净提升。

相似文献

1
Impact of acquisition protocols and processing streams on tissue segmentation of T1 weighted MR images.采集协议和处理流程对T1加权磁共振图像组织分割的影响。
Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.035. Epub 2005 Aug 31.
2
Validation of partial tissue segmentation of single-channel magnetic resonance images of the brain.单通道脑部磁共振图像部分组织分割的验证
Neuroimage. 2000 Dec;12(6):640-56. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0649.
3
Segmentation of MRI brain scans using non-uniform partial volume densities.基于非均匀部分体素密度的 MRI 脑扫描分割。
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):467-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.041. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
4
Improving segmentation accuracy for magnetic resonance imaging using a boosted decision tree.使用增强决策树提高磁共振成像的分割精度。
J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Nov 15;175(2):206-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.08.017. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
5
Statistical approach to segmentation of single-channel cerebral MR images.单通道脑磁共振图像分割的统计方法
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997 Apr;16(2):176-86. doi: 10.1109/42.563663.
6
Multi-spectral brain tissue segmentation using automatically trained k-Nearest-Neighbor classification.使用自动训练的k近邻分类法进行多光谱脑组织分割
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):71-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 May 21.
7
T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T1-weighted fast spin-echo contrast-enhanced imaging: a comparison in 20 patients with brain lesions.T1加权液体衰减反转恢复序列与T1加权快速自旋回波对比增强成像:20例脑病变患者的比较
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Aug;53(4):366-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02093.x.
8
Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model.使用部分容积模型的磁共振图像组织分类
Neuroimage. 2001 May;13(5):856-76. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0730.
9
Automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance images using a decision tree with spatial information.使用带有空间信息的决策树对磁共振图像进行自动分割。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2009 Mar;33(2):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
10
Multicontext wavelet-based thresholding segmentation of brain tissues in magnetic resonance images.基于多上下文小波阈值法的磁共振图像脑组织分割
Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Apr;25(3):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
UltimateSynth: MRI Physics for Pan-Contrast AI.终极合成器:用于泛对比度人工智能的磁共振成像物理学
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 10:2024.12.05.627056. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.05.627056.
2
Unraveling schizophrenia replicable functional connectivity disruption patterns across sites.解析精神分裂症在各研究点间可复制的功能连接破坏模式。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Jan;44(1):156-169. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26108. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
Inter-scanner reproducibility of brain volumetry: influence of automated brain segmentation software.脑容量测量的扫描仪间可重复性:自动化脑分割软件的影响。
BMC Neurosci. 2020 Sep 4;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12868-020-00585-1.
4
Neuroharmony: A new tool for harmonizing volumetric MRI data from unseen scanners.神经协调:一种用于协调来自未知扫描仪的容积 MRI 数据的新工具。
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117127. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117127. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
5
Whole Brain and Cranial Size Adjustments in Volumetric Brain Analyses of Sex- and Age-Related Trends.性别和年龄相关趋势的脑容量分析中的全脑和颅骨大小调整
Front Neurosci. 2020 Apr 3;14:278. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00278. eCollection 2020.
6
DeepHarmony: A deep learning approach to contrast harmonization across scanner changes.DeepHarmony:一种深度学习方法,用于跨扫描仪变化进行对比调和。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Dec;64:160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.041. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
7
Big GABA II: Water-referenced edited MR spectroscopy at 25 research sites.大 GABA II:25 个研究点的水参照编辑磁共振波谱。
Neuroimage. 2019 May 1;191:537-548. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.059. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
8
Whole-brain atrophy assessed by proportional- versus registration-based pipelines from 3T MRI in multiple sclerosis.3T MRI 基于比例和配准的全脑萎缩评估在多发性硬化中的应用。
Brain Behav. 2018 Aug;8(8):e01068. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1068. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Longitudinally and inter-site consistent multi-atlas based parcellation of brain anatomy using harmonized atlases.使用协调图谱进行基于多图谱的脑解剖结构的纵向和站点间一致性分割。
Neuroimage. 2018 Feb 1;166:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.026. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
10
Patch Based Synthesis of Whole Head MR Images: Application to EPI Distortion Correction.基于补丁的全脑磁共振图像合成:在回波平面成像失真校正中的应用。
Simul Synth Med Imaging. 2016 Oct;9968:146-156. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46630-9_15. Epub 2016 Sep 23.