Arnott S J, Duncan W, Gignoux M, Hansen H S, Launois B, Nygaard K, Parmar M K B, Rousell A, Spilopoulos G, Stewart G, Tierney J F, Wang M, Rhugang Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD001799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001799.pub2.
The existing randomized evidence has failed to conclusively demonstrate the benefit or otherwise of preoperative radiotherapy in treating patients with potentially resectable esophageal carcinoma.
This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether there is benefit from adding radiotherapy prior to surgery and whether or not any pre-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from preoperative radiotherapy
MEDLINE and CancerLit searches were supplemented by information from trial registers and by hand searching relevant meeting proceedings and by discussion with relevant trialists, organisations and industry. The search strategy was run again in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library on 30th April 2001, two years after original publication. No new trials were found. The search strategy was re-run August 2002 and August 2003 on MEDLINE, EMBASE , CancerLit and The Cochrane Library, and July 2004 and 2005 on MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. No new relevant trials were identified on any of these occasions.
Trials were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis provided they randomized patients with potentially resectable carcinoma of the esophagus (of any histological type) to receive radiotherapy or no radiotherapy prior to surgery. Trials must have used a randomization method which precluded prior knowledge of treatment assignment and completed accrual by December 1993, to ensure sufficient follow-up by the time of the first analysis (September 1995).
A quantitative meta-analysis using updated data from individual patients from all properly randomized trials (published or unpublished) comprising 1147 patients (971 deaths) from five randomized trials. This approach was used to assess whether preoperative radiotherapy improves overall survival and whether it is differentially effective in patients defined by age, sex and tumour location.
With a median follow-up of 9 years, in a group patients with mostly squamous carcinomas, the hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.78-1.01) suggests an overall reduction in the risk of death of 11% and an absolute survival benefit of 3% at 2 years and 4% at 5 years. This result is not conventionally statistically significant (p=0.062). No clear differences in the size of the effect by sex, age or tumor location were apparent.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing trials, there was no clear evidence that preoperative radiotherapy improves the survival of patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. These results indicate that if such preoperative radiotherapy regimens do improve survival, then the effect is likely to be modest with an absolute improvement in survival of around 3 to 4%. Trials or a meta-analysis of around 2000 patients (90% power, 5% significance level) would be needed to reliably detect such an improvement (from 15 to 20%).
现有的随机对照证据未能确凿地证明术前放疗对可切除食管癌患者是否有益。
本荟萃分析旨在评估术前增加放疗是否有益,以及是否有任何预先定义的患者亚组从术前放疗中获益更多或更少。
通过试验注册信息、手工检索相关会议记录以及与相关试验者、组织和行业进行讨论,对MEDLINE和CancerLit数据库的检索进行补充。在原始发表两年后的2001年4月30日,再次在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中运行检索策略。未发现新的试验。2002年8月和2003年8月在MEDLINE、EMBASE、CancerLit和Cochrane图书馆中重新运行检索策略,2004年7月和2005年在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中重新运行检索策略。在这些检索中均未发现新的相关试验。
若试验将具有潜在可切除食管癌(任何组织学类型)的患者随机分为术前接受放疗或不接受放疗两组,则该试验符合纳入本荟萃分析的条件。试验必须采用排除治疗分配先验知识的随机化方法,并在1993年12月前完成入组,以确保在首次分析(1995年9月)时有足够的随访时间。
采用定量荟萃分析,使用来自所有适当随机试验(已发表或未发表)的个体患者的更新数据,这些试验共纳入1147例患者(971例死亡),来自五项随机试验。该方法用于评估术前放疗是否能提高总生存率,以及在按年龄、性别和肿瘤位置定义的患者中是否具有不同的疗效。
中位随访9年,在主要为鳞癌患者组中,风险比(HR)为0.89(95%可信区间0.78 - 1.01),表明死亡风险总体降低11%,2年时绝对生存获益为3%,5年时为4%。该结果在传统统计学上无显著意义(p = 0.062)。在性别、年龄或肿瘤位置方面,疗效大小无明显差异。
基于现有试验,没有明确证据表明术前放疗能提高潜在可切除食管癌患者的生存率。这些结果表明,如果此类术前放疗方案确实能提高生存率,那么效果可能较小,绝对生存改善约为3%至4%。需要约2000例患者的试验或荟萃分析(检验效能90%,显著性水平5%)才能可靠地检测到这种改善(从15%至20%)。